Abstract:Web of Science (WoS) and Google Scholar (GS) are prominent citation services with distinct indexing mechanisms. Comprehensive knowledge about the growth patterns of these two citation services is lacking. We analyzed the development of citation counts in WoS and GS for two classic articles and 56 articles from diverse research fields, making a distinction between retroactive growth (i.e., the relative difference between citation counts up to mid-2005 measured in mid-2005 and citation counts up to mid-2005 measured in April 2013) and actual growth (i.e., the relative difference between citation counts up to mid-2005 measured in April 2013 and citation counts up to April 2013 measured in April 2013). One of the classic articles was used for a citation-by-citation analysis. Results showed that GS has substantially grown in a retroactive manner (median of 170 % across articles), especially for articles that initially had low citations counts in GS as compared to WoS. Retroactive growth of WoS was small, with a median of 2 % across articles. Actual growth percentages were moderately higher for GS than for WoS (medians of 54 vs. 41 %). The citation-by-citation analysis showed that the percentage of citations being unique in WoS was lower for more recent citations (6.8 % for citations from 1995 and later vs. 41 % for citations from before 1995), whereas the opposite was noted for GS (57 vs. 33 %). It is concluded that, since its inception, GS has shown substantial expansion, and that the majority of recent works indexed in WoS are now also retrievable via GS. A discussion is provided on quantity versus quality of citations, threats for WoS, weaknesses of GS, and implications for literature research and research evaluation.

Google Scholar Metrics evolution: an analysis according to languages

Google Scholar Metrics 2014: a low cost bibliometric tool

H Index of History journals published in Spain according to Google Scholar Metrics (2007-2011)

H Index of scientific Nursing journals according to Google Scholar Metrics (2007-2011)

Google Scholar Metrics 2013: nothing new under the sun

Ranking journals: Could Google Scholar Metrics be an alternative to Journal Citation Reports and Scimago Journal Rank?

Google Scholar and the h-index in biomedicine: the popularization of bibliometric asessment

The counting house: measuring those who count. Presence of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Informetrics, Webometrics and Altmetrics in the Google Scholar Citations, ResearcherID, ResearchGate, Mendeley & Twitter

Global Distribution of Google Scholar Citations: A Size-independent Institution-based Analysis

The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study

Back to the past: on the shoulders of an academic search engine giant

Google Scholar as a Data Source for Research Assessment

ResearchGate and Google Scholar: how much do they differ in publications, citations and different metrics and why?

Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents?

Ranking by Relevance and Citation Counts, a Comparative Study: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, WoS and Scopus

How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox?

Assessing the accuracy of the h and g indexes for measuring researchers' productivity

Manipulating Google Scholar Citations and Google Scholar Metrics: simple, easy and tempting

A new methodology for comparing Google Scholar and Scopus

Author-level metrics in the new academic profile platforms: The online behaviour of the Bibliometrics community

Google Scholar: the 'big data' bibliographic tool