Abstract:The field of predator eavesdropping concentrates on the detection by a predator or parasite of signals that prey direct at conspecifics, and the subsequent evolution by prey to avoid or lessen such detection. Here, we first point out that signaling prey species are often found in mixed-species moving groups or stationary aggregations, and ask the question of how simultaneous signaling, by members of one species or more, might affect predator eavesdropping behavior and the composition of the groups themselves. The detection risk of prey species will be affected by the other species they associate with, and prey should generally avoid joining a group with more detectable species. Yet prey may select to join other species that are preferred by predators, diluting their own risk of attack, as long as that does not lead to substantially greater detection and thereby increased predation. We next review the evidence that prey grouping and collective responses when attacked can confuse predators, leading to lower capture rates. Evidence for this confusion effect mostly involves visually orienting predators. We then ask if a similar phenomenon could occur when animals in a group simultaneously produce acoustic signals and find relevant evidence for predator confusion under such situations in the literature associated with the "cocktail party effect." As confusion is heightened by similarities among mixed-species group members, this provides a force at ecological or evolutionary timescales to make species that associate in groups, and their signals, more similar to each other. However, heterogeneous mixed-species groups may be favored if species are differentially preferred as prey. We suggest experiments to examine whether the success rates of acoustically orienting predators depend on the group size of their mixed-species prey. More observations on the relative positions of conspecifics and heterospecifics in space, and the temporal association of their signals, will also increase our understanding of the relationship between mixed-species grouping and predator eavesdropping.

From Cues to Signals: Evolution of Interspecific Communication Via Aposematism and Mimicry in a Predator-Prey System

A modeling study of predator--prey interaction propounding honest signals and cues

Physiological basis of convergent evolution in animal communication systems

Exploring the coevolution of predator and prey morphology and behavior

Social transmission of avoidance among predators facilitates the spread of novel prey

A Signal-Centric Perspective on the Evolution of Symbolic Communication

Evolution of Cooperation Via Covert Signaling

Chapter 6 – Communication

Ecological principles for the evolution of communication in collective systems

Detectability of a poison frog and its Batesian mimic depends on body posture and viewing angle

The 'sexual selection hypothesis' for the origin of aposematism

It’s a Matter of Taste: Avian Predators Taste Reject Mimetic Prey in Relation to Signal Reliability

Shibboleth: An agent-based model of signalling mimicry

Predation-associated modulation of movement-based signals by a Bahamian lizard

Territoriality, Social Bonds, and the Evolution of Communal Signaling in Birds

Essential conditions for evolution of communication within a species

Behavioral Strategy Chases Promote the Evolution of Prey Intelligence

How does communication evolve? Insights from geographic variation in facial signaling in Polistes paper wasps

Honest signalling in predator-prey interactions: testing the resource allocation hypothesis

Surviving the serenade: how conflicting selection pressures shape the early stages of sexual signal diversification

Predator Eavesdropping in a Mixed-Species Environment: How Prey Species May Use Grouping, Confusion, and the Cocktail Party Effect to Reduce Predator Detection