Abstract:Objective To detect adverse drug reaction(ADR)signals using data mining algorithm and exPlore its aPPlication value. Methods RePorts on adverse reactions induced by anti-infective drugs in National centor for ADR monitoring from January 2009 to December 2013 were collected and Potential ADR risk signals were detected using ProPortional rePorting ratio method( PRR),rePorting odds ratio method( ROR),Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency method( MHRA),Bayesian confidence ProPagation neural network method(BCPNN),and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker method (MGPS). The results of detection using the above-mentioned 5 signal detection methods were comPared. Results A total of 35 807 ADR rePorts induced by anti-infective drugs were collected,35 759 effective rePorts were entered,and 834 susPected drugs were involved. In the 35 759 rePorts,464 kinds of ADR were defined according to lowest level term and 21 kinds of ADR were defined according to system∕ organ classification. After the data cleaning,sPlitting,and encoding Process,6 620 rePorts containing susPected drug-adverse reaction combination were acquired. There were 3 966 rePorts(59. 91% )in which susPected drug-adverse reaction combination aPPeared once,937 rePorts(14. 15% )in which susPected drug-adverse reaction combination aPPeared twice,and 1 717 rePorts(25. 94% ) in which susPicious drug-adverse reaction combination aPPeared more than thrice. The number of ADR signals detected using PRR,ROR, MGPS,BCPNN,and MHRA was 651,614,306,75,and 57,resPectively;the categories of drugs were194,168,124,34 and 40,resPectively;ADR tyPes were 139,139,121,35,and 40,resPectively. In the toP ten risk signals,azithromycin-nausea were detected by the 5 signal detection methods,levofloxacin-Pruritus were detected by PRR,ROR,MHRA,and BCPNN. The toP ten signals detected by PRR were totally same as those by ROR and signals detected by other methods were various. Conclusions Potential risk signals in ADR rePorts could be detected systematically and automatically using PRR,ROR,MGPS, BCPNN,and MHRA. However,each method has its own advantage and disadvantage and should be aPPlied according to the actual situation and demand.

Detect adverse drug reactions for drug Pioglitazone

Feature selection in detection of adverse drug reactions from the Health Improvement Network (THIN) database

Detecting adverse drug reactions for the drug Simvastatin

Detect adverse drug reactions for drug Atorvastatin

Detect adverse drug reactions for the drug Pravastatin

Detect adverse drug reactions for drug Alendronate

Detect Adverse Drug Reactions for Drug Aspirin

Identification of Adverse Drug Events in Chinese Clinical Narrative Text

Drug Safety Signal Detection in a Regional Healthcare Database Using the Tree-Based Scan Statistic and Comparison to 3 Other Mining Methods

Establishment of a Rapid Identification of Adverse Drug Reaction Program in R Language Implementation Based on Monitoring Data

Comparison of algorithms that detect drug side effects using electronic healthcare databases

A Recognition Method for Diabetic Retinopathy Based on Feature Selection

Predicting Drugs Suspected of Causing Adverse Drug Reactions Using Graph Features and Attention Mechanisms

BiMPADR: A Deep Learning Framework for Predicting Adverse Drug Reactions in New Drugs

Machine Learning for Predicting Hyperglycemic Cases Induced by PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors

Discovering Outliers of Potential Drug Toxicities Using a Large-scale Data-driven Approach

Application of Data Mining Algorithm to Detect Adverse Drug Reaction Signal

A method for systematic discovery of adverse drug events from clinical notes.

Detecting high-quality signals of adverse drug-drug interactions from spontaneous reporting data

In Silico Search Of Putative Adverse Drug Reaction Related Proteins As A Potential Tool For Facilitating Drug Adverse Effect Prediction

A machine learning-based risk warning platform for potentially inappropriate prescriptions for elderly patients with cardiovascular disease