Abstract:We calculate the formation cross sections of transactinides (superheavy elements), as well as heavy actinides (No and Lr), which have been or might be obtained in fusion reactions with the evaporation of only one neutron. We use both more realistic fusion barrier and survival probability of the compound nucleus in comparison with the original phenomenological model [Phys. Rev. C 59, 2634 (1999)] that prompted the Berkeley experiment on the synthesis of a new superheavy element 118 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1104 (1999)]. Calculations are performed for asymmetric and symmetric target-projectile combinations and for reactions with stable and radioactive-ion beams. The formation cross sections measured at GSI-Darmstadt for transactinides and heavy actinides, as well as that for superheavy element 118 reported by the LBNL-Berkeley group, are reproduced within a factor of 2.4, on average. Based on the obtained relatively large cross sections, we predict that optimal reactions with stable beams for the synthesis of so far unobserved superheavy elements 119, 120, and 121 are 209Bi(86Kr, 1n)294119, 208Pb(88Sr, 1n)295120, and 209Bi(88Sr, 1n)296121, respectively. This is because of the magic of both the target and the projectile that leads to larger Q value and, consequently, lower effective fusion barrier with larger transmission probability. The same effect is responsible for relatively large cross sections predicted for the symmetric reactions 136Xe(124Sn, 1n)259Rf, 136Xe(136Xe, 1n)271Hs,138Ba(136Xe, 1n)273110, and 140Ce(136Xe, 1n)275112. Although shell effects in the magic nuclei 124Sn, 136Xe, 138Ba, and 140Ce are not as strong as in 208Pb and 209Bi, they act on both the target and the projectile and lead to the prediction of measurable cross sections.

Calculations of the cross sections for synthesis of new {293-296}118 isotopes in {249-252}Cf(48Ca,xn) reactions

Predictions of the FBD model for the synthesis cross sections of Z = 114-120 elements based on macroscopic-microscopic fission barriers

Possibility to Synthesize Z > 118 Superheavy Nuclei with 54cr Projectiles

Influence of Hexadecapole Deformation on Production Cross Sections of Superheavy Nuclei

Predictions of synthesizing elements with and 120 in fusion reactions

Formation of superheavy elements in cold fusion reactions

Production cross-sections of new superheavy elements with Z = 119-120 in fusion-evaporation reactions

Properties and Synthesis of the Superheavy Nucleus Fl114298

Fusion cross section of the superheavy $Z$ = 120 nuclei within the relativistic mean-field formalism

Confirmation of Super Heavy Element Production in [sup 48]ca Induced Fusion Reactions A Handshake of Physics and Chemistry for Element 112

Rare isotope formation in complete fusion and multinucleon transfer reactions in collisions of Ca 48 + Cm 248 near Coulomb barrier energies

Examination of promising reactions with $^{241}$Am and $^{244}$Cm targets for the synthesis of new superheavy elements within the dinuclear system model with a dynamical potential energy surface

Optimal colliding energy for the synthesis of superheavy element $Z$=119

Significance of the compound nucleus surface energy coefficients in the synthesis of the superheavy nuclei with $\textbf{Z=112-120}$

Calculation of Evaporation Residue Cross Sections for the Synthesis of Superheavy Nuclei in Hot Fusion Reactions

Predictions for the Synthesis of the Z=120 Superheavy Element

Production cross sections of isotopes in fusion reactions

Predictions for the synthesis of the <i>Z</i>=119 superheavy element

Survival Probabilities of Compound Superheavy Nuclei Towards Element 119

Fusion enhancement in the collisions with beams and the production of neutron-deficient isotopes

Examining the potential synthesis of new elements with $^{294}$Og