Abstract:We show that, for all reasonable functions $T(n)=o(n\log n)$, we can algorithmically verify whether a given one-tape Turing machine runs in time at most $T(n)$. This is a tight bound on the order of growth for the function $T$ because we prove that, for $T(n)\geq(n+1)$ and $T(n)=\Omega(n\log n)$, there exists no algorithm that would verify whether a given one-tape Turing machine runs in time at most $T(n)$.
We give results also for the case of multi-tape Turing machines. We show that we can verify whether a given multi-tape Turing machine runs in time at most $T(n)$ iff $T(n_0)< (n_0+1)$ for some $n_0\in\mathbb{N}$.
We prove a very general undecidability result stating that, for any class of functions $\mathcal{F}$ that contains arbitrary large constants, we cannot verify whether a given Turing machine runs in time $T(n)$ for some $T\in\mathcal{F}$. In particular, we cannot verify whether a Turing machine runs in constant, polynomial or exponential time.
Logic in Computer Science,Computational Complexity,Formal Languages and Automata Theory
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the verifiability of the time complexity of Turing machines. Specifically, the author explores, for a given time function \(T(n)\), whether it is possible to algorithmically verify whether a deterministic Turing machine (whether single - tape or multi - tape) runs in at most \(T(n)\) time.
### Summary of Main Problems:
1. **Verification of the Time Complexity of Single - Tape Turing Machines**:
- For all reasonable functions \(T(n)=o(n\log n)\), it is possible to algorithmically verify whether a given single - tape Turing machine runs in at most \(T(n)\) time.
- When \(T(n)\geq(n + 1)\) and \(T(n)=\Omega(n\log n)\), there is no algorithm that can verify whether a given single - tape Turing machine runs in at most \(T(n)\) time.
2. **Verification of the Time Complexity of Multi - Tape Turing Machines**:
- It is possible to verify whether a given multi - tape Turing machine runs in at most \(T(n)\) time if and only if there exists some \(n_0\in\mathbb{N}\) such that \(T(n_0)<n_0 + 1\).
3. **General Undecidability Results**:
- For any class of functions \(F\) that contains arbitrarily large constants, it is not possible to verify whether a given Turing machine runs in time \(T(n)\), where \(T\in F\). In particular, it is not possible to verify whether a Turing machine runs in constant, polynomial, or exponential time.
### Key Conclusions:
- **Tight Bounds**: For single - tape Turing machines, when \(T(n)=o(n\log n)\), its time complexity can be verified; when \(T(n)\geq n\log n\), it cannot be verified.
- **Manageable Functions**: For some specific "manageable" functions \(T(n)\), it is possible to verify whether a single - tape Turing machine runs in \(T(n)\) time. For example, the linear function \(Cn+D\) and some more complex functions such as \((n + 1)\sqrt{\log(n + 2)}\).
### Research Motivation and Background:
The research motivation of the paper stems from the undecidability of the Halting Problem. Although we cannot algorithmically determine whether a Turing machine will halt, for some specific time - complexity functions \(T(n)\), we can verify whether a Turing machine runs within its range. This provides a new perspective for understanding the time complexity of Turing machines and reveals the differences between different models (single - tape vs multi - tape).
### Methods and Techniques:
- **Crossing Sequences**: This is the main tool for analyzing single - tape Turing machines and is used to prove the decidability under certain time - complexity functions.
- **Reduction Technique**: By reducing the Halting Problem to the time - complexity verification problem, the undecidability of time - complexity verification in some cases is proved.
In general, this paper, through strict mathematical proofs and constructive methods, deeply explores the verifiability boundaries of the time complexity of Turing machines and provides important insights for computational complexity theory in theoretical computer science.