Abstract:Consider two treatments and a combination of them. Given n available experimental units, the problem is to determine the number of units n, to be assigned to the first treatment, n 2 to the second, and n, to the combination, n = Σ i , n i , n i ≥ 0, i = 1, 2, 3, subject to suitable optimality criteria. This study was motivated by an example of a weighing design with n = 18. n 1 = 2. n 2 = 9, n s = 7 given by Box and Tiao [2, Section 2.7.3]. The allocation seemed far from optimal leading to the present investigation. Four models are developed for two non-interactive treatments and the combination of them. They may be described as 1. A weighing model, 2. A sum of independent random variables model, 3. A mixtures model, and 4. A factorial model. Three optimality criteria are considered: 1. D-optimality, 2. A-optimality and 3. minimization of the variance of the difference of estimators of the two treatment means. It is shown for all criteria for Models 2, 3, 4 and for Criterion 3 for Model I that n s = 0, n 1 = n 2 = n/2 if n is even, n 1 = (n + 1)/2. n 2 = (n – 1)/2 if n is odd. But rather different optimal designs are obtained for Criteria 1 and 2 and Model I, different for the two criteria and different also from the design of the Box-Tiao example. The results presented here are of interest for two reasons. They have intrinsic interest showing that the choice of model and optimality criterion may lead to an intuitively unexpected design in a simple experimental situation. They have instructional interest providing elementary illustrations of modern design concepts that may be used as class examples or problems for solution.

Optimal discriminating designs for several competing regression models

Efficient computation of Bayesian optimal discriminating designs

Optimal discrimination designs for semi-parametric models

Optimal Bayesian design for model discrimination via classification

Hybrid algorithms for generating optimal designs for discriminating multiple nonlinear models under various error distributional assumptions

Optimal designs for comparing several regression curves

Optimal Designs For Two Non-Interactive Treatment

A reinforced learning approach to optimal design under model uncertainty

D ‐optimal designs for multi‐response linear models with two groups

Optimal designs for comparing curves

D-optimal Designs for Multinomial Logistic Models

The polytope of optimal approximate designs: extending the selection of informative experiments

R-optimal designs for multi-response regression models with multi-factors

Optimal designs for frequentist model averaging

The semi-algebraic geometry of saturated optimal designs for the Bradley-Terry model

G-optimal designs for hierarchical linear models: an equivalence theorem and a nature-inspired meta-heuristic algorithm

Optimal experimental designs for treatment contrasts in heteroscedastic models with covariates

CVXSADes: a stochastic algorithm for constructing optimal exact regression designs with single or multiple objectives

Optimal designs for multiple treatments with unequal variances

Optimal designs for treatment comparisons represented by graphs

Evaluation of combinatorial optimisation algorithms for c-optimal experimental designs with correlated observations