Abstract:Manipulative field experiments provide a window into the complexity of nature. Yet there is concern that we lack resolution by conducting experiments on a scale that is too small and short to include the relevant complexity of the study system. We addressed this issue by asking how and why the scale (local and global spatial extent, spatial grain, duration) and complexity (number of species, factors, treatment combinations) of experiments performed on marine hard substrata (rocky intertidal, RI; coral reef, CR; rocky subtidal, RS; mangrove root, MR) has changed by assessing 311 total experiments published since 1961 in Ecology and Ecological Monographs and since 1967 in Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. We show that the local spatial extent and all metrics of complexity increased as a positive, log‐linear function of time. In contrast, the size of experimental units (spatial grain) decreased with time. Quantile regression analysis revealed that these trends are largely driven by changes in the upper bounds of experimental scale and complexity; most studies are still relatively simple in design and conducted over small areas. A structural equation model (SEM) incorporated the direct and indirect effects of six metrics indicating that the complexity of field experiments has increased both as a direct effect of time and because experiments have become smaller in spatial grain. The SEM also showed longer experiments tended to be more complex. We show striking habitat differences, as subtidal experiments (CR, RS) involved more species and were carried out on the largest global spatial scales. RI experiments were the longest. Future prospects to incorporate more of the complexity of nature into field experiments include site replication, as only 34.7% of all experiments were conducted at more than one site, open experimental designs monitored by technology, and integrating experimental manipulations with long‐term monitoring to achieve mechanistic insight across scales relevant to human alteration of the biosphere. The increasing resolution of remote sensing also creates opportunities to track experiment‐driven changes in community structure across large scales. We suggest applying these methods to a wider class of problems to enhance our understanding of marine communities and ecosystems.

Measuring Complexity in an Aquatic Ecosystem

[Complexity of Land Ecosystem].

Quantifying spatial complexity in submerged aquatic vegetation landscapes using remote sensing: Lessons from simulated and real landscapes

Measuring the Complexity of Ultra-Large-Scale Adaptive Systems

Towards an integration of scale and complexity in marine ecology

Characterizing annual flood patterns variation using information and complexity indices

High Dimensionality of the Stability of a Marine Benthic Ecosystem

Measuring Human Assessed Complexity in Synthetic Aperture Sonar Imagery Using the Elo Rating System

Statistical measures of complexity applied to ecological networks

Potentials and limitations of complexity research for environmental sciences and modern farming applications

Incoherence: A Generalized Measure of Complexity to Quantify Ensemble Divergence in Multi-Trial Experiments and Simulations

Complexity measure of extreme events

The Enigma of Complexity

Resilience, reactivity and variability : A mathematical comparison of ecological stability measures

Beyond individual, population, and community: Considering information, cell number, and energy flux as fundamental dimensions of life across scales

Dynamic Ecological System Measures

Metrics of Structural Change As Indicators of Chironomid Community Stability in High Latitude Lakes

Quantifying the intricacies of biological pattern formation: A new perspective through complexity measures

Quantifying Complexity: An Object-Relations Approach to Complex Systems

ComplexityMeasures.jl: scalable software to unify and accelerate entropy and complexity timeseries analysis

Complexity-Entropy Causality Plane as a Complexity Measure for Two-dimensional Patterns