Abstract:We study social choice mechanisms in an implicit utilitarian framework with a metric constraint, where the goal is to minimize Distortion, the worst case social cost of an ordinal mechanism relative to underlying cardinal utilities. We consider two additional desiderata: Constant sample complexity and Squared Distortion. Constant sample complexity means that the mechanism (potentially randomized) only uses a constant number of ordinal queries regardless of the number of voters and alternatives. Squared Distortion is a measure of variance of the Distortion of a randomized mechanism.Our primary contribution is the first social choice mechanism with constant sample complexity and constant Squared Distortion (which also implies constant Distortion). We call the mechanism Random Referee, because it uses a random agent to compare two alternatives that are the favorites of two other random agents. We prove that the use of a comparison query is necessary: no mechanism that only elicits the top-k preferred alternatives of voters (for constant k) can have Squared Distortion that is sublinear in the number of alternatives. We also prove that unlike any top-k only mechanism, the Distortion of Random Referee meaningfully improves on benign metric spaces, using the Euclidean plane as a canonical example. Finally, among top-1 only mechanisms, we introduce Random Oligarchy. The mechanism asks just 3 queries and is essentially optimal among the class of such mechanisms with respect to Distortion.In summary, we demonstrate the surprising power of constant sample complexity mechanisms generally, and just three random voters in particular, to provide some of the best known results in the implicit utilitarian framework.

Disappointment in Social Choice Protocols

A new social welfare function with a number of desirable properties

Disappointment Concordance and Duet Expectiles

Social Choice with Changing Preferences: Representation Theorems and Long-Run Policies

Reality-Aware Social Choice

What If I Don't Like Any Of The Choices? The Limits of Preference Elicitation for Participatory Algorithm Design

Sequential Deliberation for Social Choice

Resolute refinements of social choice correspondences

Random Dictators with a Random Referee: Constant Sample Complexity Mechanisms for Social Choice

Optimizing Over Serial Dictatorships

Don't Roll the Dice, Ask Twice: The Two-Query Distortion of Matching Problems and Beyond

Balancedness of Social Choice Correspondences

Two principles for two-person social choice

On Incentive Compatible Competitive Selection Protocols.

Breaking ties in collective decision making

Randomized Social Choice Functions Under Metric Preferences

A general impossibility theorem on Pareto efficiency and Bayesian incentive compatibility

Incentives in Social Decision Schemes with Pairwise Comparison Preferences

Selecting Representative Bodies: An Axiomatic View

On the reversal bias of the Minimax social choice correspondence

Game-Theoretically Secure Protocols for the Ordinal Random Assignment Problem