Abstract:Implementations of concurrent objects should guarantee linearizability and a progress property such as wait-freedom, lock-freedom, starvation-freedom, or deadlock-freedom. These progress properties describe conditions under which a method call is guaranteed to complete. However, they fail to describe how clients are affected, making it difficult to utilize them in layered and modular program verification. Also we lack verification techniques for starvation-free or deadlock-free objects. They are challenging to verify because the fairness assumption introduces complicated interdependencies among progress of threads. Even worse, none of the existing results applies to concurrent objects with partial methods, i.e., methods that are supposed not to return under certain circumstances. A typical example is the lock_acquire method, which must not return when the lock has already been acquired. In this tutorial we examine the progress properties of concurrent objects. We formulate each progress property (together with linearizability as a basic correctness requirement) in terms of contextual refinement. This essentially gives us progress-aware abstraction for concurrent objects. Thus, when verifying clients of the objects, we can soundly replace the concrete object implementations with their abstractions, achieving modular verification. For concurrent objects with partial methods, we formulate two new progress properties, partial starvation-freedom (PSF) and partial deadlock-freedom (PDF). We also design four patterns to write abstractions for PSF or PDF objects under strongly or weakly fair scheduling, so that these objects contextually refine their abstractions. Finally, we introduce a rely-guarantee style program logic LiLi for verifying linearizability and progress together for concurrent objects. It unifies thread-modular reasoning about all the six progress properties (wait-freedom, lock-freedom, starvation-freedom, deadlock-freedom, PSF and PDF) in one framework. We have successfully applied LiLi to verify starvation-freedom or deadlock-freedom of representative algorithms such as lock-coupling lists, optimistic lists and lazy lists, and PSF or PDF of lock algorithms.

Verifying the Consistency of Remote Untrusted Services with Conflict-Free Operations

Verifying linearizability: A comparative survey

Abstraction for Conflict-Free Replicated Data Types.

SERENE: A Collusion Resilient Replication-based Verification Framework

Multiversion Conflict Notion for Transactional Memory Systems

Keeping CALM: When Distributed Consistency is Easy

Trustworthy Distributed Certification of Program Execution

MVOC: A Lighter Multi-Client Verifiable Outsourced Computation for Malicious Lightweight Clients

Progress of Concurrent Objects

The Right Kind of Non-Determinism: Using Concurrency to Verify C Programs with Underspecified Semantics

CoVer: Collaborative Light-Node-Only Verification and Data Availability for Blockchains

Overcoming Restraint: Composing Verification of Foreign Functions with Cogent

Refereed Delegation of Computation Using Smart Contracts

Verifiable computation with access control in cloud computing

OPERA: Reasoning about continuous common knowledge in asynchronous distributed systems

Coordination-free Collaborative Replication based on Operational Transformation

Modeling and Verification of CKB Consensus Protocol in Coq.

Validated Objects: Specification, Implementation, and Applications

VeriFx: Correct Replicated Data Types for the Masses

Asynchronous Wait-Free Runtime Verification and Enforcement of Linearizability

Blockchain-based Trustless Pair Payment Protocol for Verifiable Confidential Outsourcing Computation