Abstract:Medical Decision Making, Ahead of Print. ObjectivesUtility scores associated with preference-based health-related quality-of-life instruments such as the EQ-5D-3L are reported as point estimates. In this study, we develop methods for capturing the uncertainty associated with the valuation study of the UK EQ-5D-3L that arises from the variability inherent in the underlying data, which is tacitly ignored by point estimates. We derive a new tariff that properly accounts for this and assigns a specific closed-form distribution to the utility of each of the 243 health states of the EQ-5D-3L.MethodsUsing the UK EQ-5D-3L valuation study, we used a Bayesian approach to obtain the posterior distributions of the derived utility scores. We constructed a hierarchical model that accounts for model misspecification and the responses of the survey participants to obtain Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samples from the posteriors. The posterior distributions were approximated by mixtures of normal distributions under the Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence as the criterion for the assessment of the approximation. We considered the Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (BFGS) algorithm to estimate the parameters of the mixture distributions.ResultsWe derived an MCMC sample of total size 4,000 × 243. No evidence of nonconvergence was found. Our model was robust to changes in priors and starting values. The posterior utility distributions of the EQ-5D-3L states were summarized as 3-component mixtures of normal distributions, and the corresponding KL divergence values were low.ConclusionsOur method accounts for layers of uncertainty in valuation studies, which are otherwise ignored. Our techniques can be applied to other instruments and countries' populations.HighlightsGuidelines for health technology assessments typically require that uncertainty be accounted for in economic evaluations, but the parameter uncertainty of the regression model used in the valuation study of the health instrument is often tacitly ignored.We consider the UK valuation study of the EQ-5D-3L and construct a Bayesian model that accounts for layers of uncertainty that would otherwise be disregarded, and we derive closed-form utility distributions.The derived tariff can be used by researchers in economic evaluations, as it allows analysts to directly sample a utility value from its corresponding distribution, which reflects the associated uncertainty of the utility score.

Utility Elicitation as a Classification Problem

Problem-Focused Incremental Elicitation of Multi-Attribute Utility Models

Utilities as Random Variables: Density Estimation and Structure Discovery

Belief identification with state-dependent utilities

Classification Performance Metric Elicitation and its Applications

Model-based Utility Functions

A 2-Phase Aspiration-Level and Utility Theory Approach to Large Scale Design

An elicitation of utility for quality of life under prospect theory

Elicitation strategies for fuzzy constraint problems with missing preferences: algorithms and experimental studies

Unstructuring User Preferences: Efficient Non-Parametric Utility Revelation

Supervised Machine Learning for Eliciting Individual Demand

Policy Learning with Asymmetric Counterfactual Utilities

Learning preference representations based on Choquet integrals for multicriteria decision making

A Case Study in Knowledge Discovery and Elicitation in an Intelligent Tutoring Application

Service Center Location with Decision Dependent Utilities with an Application to Early Stage Testing and Vaccination in Epidemic Planning

Capturing Valuation Study Sampling Uncertainty in the Estimation of Health State Utility Values Using the EQ-5D-3L

Bayesian Automatic Relevance Determination for Utility Function Specification in Discrete Choice Models

Learning Economic Parameters from Revealed Preferences

Deriving the PedsUtil health state classification system to measure health utilities for pediatric populations based on the PedsQL: a confirmatory factor analysis

Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy

Human Behavioral Models Using Utility Theory and Prospect Theory