Comment on "First-principles study of the influence of (110)-oriented strain on the ferroelectric properties of rutile TiO2" [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1106.2820" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.2820">arXiv:1106.2820</a>]

Keith Refson,Barbara Montanari,Pavlin D. Mitev,Kersti Hermansson,Nicholas M. Harrison
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.136101
2013-01-24
Abstract:In a recent article, Grünebohm et al. [Phys. Rev. B 84 132105 (2011), <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1106.2820" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.2820">arXiv:1106.2820</a>] report that they fail to reproduce the A2u ferroelectric instability of TiO2 in the rutile structure calculated with density functional theory within the PBE-GGA approximation by Montanari et al. [Chem. Phys. Lett 364, 528 (2002)]. We demonstrate that this disagreement arises from an erroneous treatment of Ti 3s and 3p semi-core electrons as core in their calculations. Fortuitously the effect of the frozen semi-core pseudopotential cancels the phonon instability of the PBE exchange-correlation, and the combination yields phonon frequencies similar to the LDA harmonic values. Grünebohm et al. also attempted and failed to reproduce the soft acoustic phonon mode instability under (110) strain reported by Mitev et al. [Phys. Rev. B 81 134303 (2010)]. For this mode the combination of PBE-GGA and frozen semi-core yields a small imaginary frequency of 9.8i. The failure of Grünebohm et al. to find this mode probably arose from numerical limitations of the geometry optimization approach in the presence of a shallow double well potential; the optimization method is not suitable for locating such instabilities.
Materials Science,Computational Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?