Retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention via ipsilateral collaterals

Ahmed Al‐Ogaili,Michaella Alexandrou,Athanasios Rempakos,Deniz Mutlu,James W. Choi,Paul Poommipanit,Jaikirshan J. Khatri,Khaldoon Alaswad,Mir B. Basir,Raj H. Chandwaney,Sevket Gorgulu,Ahmed M. ElGuindy,Basem Elbarouni,Wissam Jaber,Stephane Rinfret,William Nicholson,Farouc A. Jaffer,Nazif Aygul,Lorenzo Azzalini,Kathleen E. Kearney,Jarrod Frizzell,Rhian Davies,Omer Goktekin,Bavana V. Rangan,Olga C. Mastrodemos,Yader Sandoval,M. Nicholas Burke,Emmanouil S. Brilakis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31019
IF: 2.3
2024-04-03
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Abstract:Background There is limited data on retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via ipsilateral epicardial collaterals (IEC). Aims To compare the clinical and angiographic characteristics, and outcomes of retrograde CTO PCI via IEC versus other collaterals in a large multicenter registry. Methods Observational cohort study from the Prospective Global registry for the study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS‐CTO). Results Of 4466 retrograde cases performed between 2012 and 2023, crossing through IEC was attempted in 191 (4.3%) cases with 50% wiring success. The most common target vessel in the IEC group was the left circumflex (50%), in comparison to other retrograde cases, where the right coronary artery was most common (70%). The Japanese CTO score was similar between the two groups (3.13 ± 1.23 vs. 3.06 ± 1.06, p = 0.456); however, the IEC group had a higher Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS‐CTO) score (1.95 ± 1.02 vs. 1.27 ± 0.92, p
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?