Abstract:The main issue addressed in this paper is to provide a reassessment of the role and relevance of the body in social cognition from a radical embodied cognitive science perspective. Initially, I provide a historical introduction of the traditional account of the body in cognitive science, which I here call the cognitivist view. I then present several lines of criticism raised against the cognitivist view advanced by more embodied, enacted and situated approaches in cognitive science, and related disciplines. Next, I analyze several approaches under the umbrella of embodied social cognition. My line of argument is that some of these approaches, although pointing toward the right direction of conceiving that the social mind is not merely contained inside the head, still fail to fully acknowledge the radically embodied social mind. I argue that the failure of these accounts of embodied social cognition could be associated with so-called 'simple embodiment.' The third part of this paper focuses on elaborating an alternative characterization of the radically embodied social mind that also tries to reduce the remaining problems with 'simple embodiment.' I draw upon two turns in radically embodied cognitive science, the enactive turn, and the intersubjective turn. On the one hand, there is the risk of focusing too much on the individual level in social cognition that may result in new kinds of methodological individualism that partly neglect the social dimension. On the other hand, socially distributed and socially extended approaches that pay more attention to the dynamics within social interaction may encounter the risk of ignoring the individual during social interaction dynamics and simultaneously not emphasizing the role of embodiment. The approach taken is to consider several ways of describing and incorporating the (individual) social mind at the social level that includes language. I outline some ideas and motivations for how to study and expand the field of radical embodied social cognition in the future, as well as pose the ubiquitous hazard of falling back into a cognitivism view in several ways.

What It Means to Be Human: A Response to Harzheim

What Does It Mean to Be Human Today?

Reclaiming human machine nature

Coupling First-Person Cognitive Research With Neurophilosophy and Enactivism: An Outline of Arguments

Rethinking Erich Fromm's Humanism and His View of Human Nature

Exploring Human Nature in a Technology-Driven Society

Do we really need a “Digital Humanism”? A critique based on post-human philosophy of technology and socio-legal techniques

Reexamining What It Means to Be Human

Fear of a Bot Planet: Anthropomorphism, Humanoid Embodiment, and Machine Consciousness

Is There Room for Otherness in Humanism? Erich Fromm's Alternative

Re-Thinking the Human: Heidegger, Fundamental Ontology, and Humanism

Persons in a posthuman world

Human-Engaged Computing: the future of Human–Computer Interaction

Beyond one Bayesian brain: Modeling intra- and inter-personal processes during social interaction: Commentary on “Mentalizing homeostasis: The social origins of interoceptive inference” by Fotopoulou & Tsakiris

An Empirically Informed Critique of Habermas’ Argument from Human Nature

Cultures of Embodied Experience: Technology, Religion and Body Pedagogics

A Radical Reassessment of the Body in Social Cognition

Critical Posthumanism – An Overview

Human Machine Epistemology Survey

The Inside and Outside Aspects of Consciousness: Complementary Approaches to the Study of Animal Emotion