Randomized Study of Peginterferon-α2a Plus Ribavirin vs Peginterferon-α2b Plus Ribavirin in Chronic Hepatitis C

Maria Grazia Rumi,Alessio Aghemo,Gian Maria Prati,Roberta D'Ambrosio,Maria Francesca Donato,Roberta Soffredini,Ersilio Del Ninno,Antonio Russo,Massimo Colombo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.08.071
IF: 29.4
2010-01-01
Gastroenterology
Abstract:BACKGROUND & AIMS: <AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND & AIMS" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">Ribavirin (RBV) combined with either pegylated interferon (PegIFN) alpha2a or PegIFNalpha2b is the standard of care for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Due to the lack of head-to-head studies, the 2 PegIFNs have not been directly compared. The endpoints of our study were safety and antiviral efficacy of the 2 regimens.</AbstractText>METHODS: <AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C were randomly (1:1) assigned after stratification for HCV genotype to receive either 1.5 mcg/Kg/week PegIFNalpha2b plus RBV 800-1200 mg/day or 180 mcg/week PegIFNalpha2a plus RBV 800-1200 mg/day for 24 or 48 weeks according to HCV genotype. The study was powered to detect a difference of at least 10% in safety and efficacy of the 2 regimens.</AbstractText>RESULTS: <AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The 212 patients on PegIFNalpha2a and the 219 patients on PegIFNalpha2b had similar baseline characteristics, including cirrhosis (20% vs 18%, respectively). By intention to treat, the 2 groups showed similar rates of treatment-related serious adverse events (1% vs 1%, respectively) and drop out rates for adverse effects (7% vs 6%, respectively). Overall, sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was higher in PegIFNalpha2a than in PegIFNalpha2b patients (66% vs 54%, respectively, P = .02), being 48% vs 32% in the 222 HCV-1 and -4 patients (P = .04), and 96% vs 82%, respectively, in the 143 HCV-2 patients (P = .01). PegIFNalpha2a independently predicted SVR in the logistic regression analysis (odds ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval: 1.20-2.96).</AbstractText>CONCLUSIONS: <AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Although the 2 regimens showed a similar safety profile, the PegIFNalpha2a-based treatment yielded significantly more SVR than PegIFNalpha2b.</AbstractText>
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?