Antigenic specificity of immunoprotective therapeutic vaccination for glaucoma

Sharon Bakalash,Anat Kessler,Tal Mizrahi,Robert Nussenblatt,Michal Schwartz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.03-0080
Abstract:Purpose: To investigate the antigenic specificity of the immune neuroprotective mechanism that can protect retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) against death caused by high intraocular pressure (IOP). Methods: A unilateral increase in IOP was induced in rats by argon laser photocoagulation of the episcleral veins and limbal plexus. Rats with high IOP were immunized with glatiramer acetate (Cop-1, a synthetic copolymer) or with myelin-derived or uveitogenic peptides. When the steroid drug methylprednisolone was used, it was administered intraperitoneally every other day for 12 days. Results: Vaccination with myelin-derived peptides that reside in the axons failed to protect RGCs from death caused by high IOP. In contrast, IOP-induced RGC loss was reduced by vaccination with R16, a peptide derived from interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein, an immunodominant antigen residing in the eye. The benefit of protection against IOP-induced RGC loss outweighed the cost of the monophasic experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) that transiently developed in a susceptible rat strain. Treatment with methylprednisolone alleviated the disease symptoms, but caused further loss of RGCs. Cop-1 vaccination was effective in both EAU-resistant and EAU-susceptible strains. Conclusions: To benefit damaged neurons, immune neuroprotection should be directed against immunodominant antigens that reside in the site of damage. In a rat model of high IOP, RGCs can benefit from vaccination with peptides derived from proteins that are immunodominant in the eye but not from myelin-associated proteins. This suggests that the site of primary degeneration in IOP-induced RGC loss is in the eye. Cop-1 vaccination apparently circumvents the site-specificity barrier and provides protection without risk of inducing autoimmune disease.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?