Drug therapy 1971. 6. Overdosage and poisoning.

S. E. Smith

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

[Estrogens for treatment of osteoporoses].

T. Higuchi,Ayako Tarakida,K. Abe,H. Mizunuma

2009-05-01

Abstract:It has been noted that estrogens have strong effects for suppression of bone absorption and prevention of fracture. Although WHI reports emphasized on adverse events of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) too much to avoid this therapy for osteoporosis, recently there are several statements for HRT with positive assessment. Those mentioned that considering risk factor of HRT and age factor, it is possible to use estrogens safely. There is the evidence that estrogens prevent bone fractures in not only osteoporotic women but also healthy women. It is a unique effect that only estrogen has among antiosteoporotic drugs. Taking these characters into consideration, it seems that estrogen therapy is useful for prevention of fractures in perimenopausal women irrespective of bone condition.
The five minds of a manager.

Henry Mintzberg,J. Gosling

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315250601-5

2003-11-01

Harvard business review

Abstract:Managers are told: Be global and be local. Collaborate and compete. Change, perpetually, and maintain order. Make the numbers while nurturing your people. To be effective, managers need to consider the juxtapositions in order to arrive at a deep integration of these seemingly contradictory concerns. That means they must focus not only on what they have to accomplish but also on how they have to think. When the authors, respectively the director of the Centre for Leadership Studies at the University of Exeter in the U.K. and the Cleghorn Professor of Management Studies at McGill University in Montreal, set out to develop a masters program for practicing managers, they saw that they could not rely on the usual MBA educational structure, which divides the management world into discrete business functions such as marketing and accounting. They needed an educational structure that would encourage synthesis rather than separation. Managing, they determined, involves five tasks, each with its own mind-set: managing the self (the reflective mind-set); managing organizations (the analytic mind-set); managing context (the worldly mind-set); managing relationships (the collaborative mind-set); and managing change (the action mind-set). The program is built on the exploration and integration of those five aspects of the managerial mind. The authors say it has proved powerful in the classroom and insightful in practice. Imagine the mind-sets as threads and the manager as weaver. Effective performance means weaving each mind-set over and under the others to create a fine, sturdy cloth.

Medicine,Sociology,Business
[Osteoclasts in bone metabolism].

Y. Hakeda,M. Kumegawa

1991-08-01

Abstract:Bone resorption plays an important role in bone modeling and remodeling. Osteoclasts are the cells responsible for the bone resorption. Osteoclasts are located on endosteal bone surfaces and on the periosteal surface beneath the periosteum. They are multinucleated giant cells highly polarized in their morphology and function. Among the proximal surface, the membrane and the area of the cytoplasm directly oppose to the bone surface, which are specialized into two regions. A central region consisting of many irregular cytoplasmic processes and infoldings, the ruffled border, is known to be the active site of bone resorption. Surrounding the ruffled border, a second region, the clear zone provides an area of close attachment to the mineralized bone surface. The osteoclasts secrete a large amount of protons by the action of H(+)-pump on the ruffled border into the sealed resorption cavity, resulting in the acidified microenvironment under which condition the bone matrix is dissolved. Protons are provided by the intracellular action of carbonic anhydrase. Following the secretion of the protons, several ion-transporting systems, i.e., carbonate-chloride exchanger, chloride-channel, Ca(2+)-transport systems, Na+/K(+)-ATPase, and voltage-dependent Ca(2+)-channel, are sequentially operated on both apical and basolateral cytoplasmic membranes. In addition, osteoclasts contain a large amount of lysosomal enzymes (cathepsin C, beta-glycerophosphatase, beta-glucuronidase, etc.), which contribute to degrade the bone organic matrices exposed in the resorption cavity. These enzymes bind to the mannose-6-phosphate receptor on Golgi apparatus, are transported to the ruffled border and are secreted into the extracellular compartment in an exocytotic manner. Osteoclasts also have a high tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase activity which is currently used as a marker enzyme osteoclastic differentiation. Osteoclasts are considered to develop from hematopoietic stem cells. So far, the following four different pathways of the differentiation of osteoclast are proposed: The precursors of osteoclast develop (1) from multilineage hematopoietic cells via a completely separate differentiation line, (2) from granulocyte macrophage-colony forming cells, (3) from committed but proliferative monocyte-macrophage, and (4) from mature and unproliferative monocyte-macrophage. However, the differentiation line of the osteoclasts has still to be elucidated. The formation of osteoclasts as well as that of other hematopoietic cells is strongly regulated by many cytokines [interleukin (IL)-1,IL-3,IL-6, M-colony stimulating factor (CSF), and GM-CSF]. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and parathyroid hormone also stimulate the differentiation of osteoclast precursors. However, the mature osteoclasts do not possess the receptors for these hormones.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices

P. Drucker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2230551

Abstract:Management is tasks. Management is a discipline. Peter Drucker's classic text on the subject reminds us that management is also people. Every achievement of management is the achievement of a manager. Every failure is a failure of a manager. People manage, not "forces" or "facts." The vision, dedication, and integrity of managers determine whether there is management or mismanagement. Management is work, and as such it has its own skills, its own tools, its own techniques. For management is the life-giving, acting, dynamic organ of the institution it manages. Without the institution, e.g., the business enterprise, there would be no management. But without management there would also be only a mob rather than an institution. The institution, in turn, is itself an organ of society and exists only to contribute a needed result to society, the economy, and the individual. What every manager needs to know has been included in Drucker's book. That which not every manager needs to know, however important or interesting, has been excluded, or at least given only cursory treatment. A good deal of space has been devoted to top management and to the relationships between structure and strategy - topics that are not commonly considered in a book on management. While management is a discipline - that is, an organized body of knowledge and as such applicable everywhere - it is also "culture." It is not value-free science, management is a social function and embedded in a culture - a society - a tradition of values, customs, and beliefs, and in governmental and political systems. Management is - and should be - culture conditioned; but, in turn, management and managers shape culture and society.

Sociology,Business
Getting past yes: negotiating as if implementation mattered

Danny Ertel

Abstract:Many deals that look good on paper never materialize into value-creating endeavors. Often, the problem begins at the negotiating table. In fact, the very person everyone thinks is pivotal to a deal's success--the negotiator--is often the one who undermines it. That's because most negotiators have a deal maker mind-set: They see the signed contract as the final destination rather than the start of a cooperative venture. What's worse, most companies reward negotiators on the basis of the number and size of the deals they're signing, giving them no incentive to change. The author asserts that organizations and negotiators must transition from a deal maker mentality--which involves squeezing your counterpart for everything you can get--to an implementation mind-set--which sets the stage for a healthy working relationship long after the ink has dried. Achieving an implementation mind-set demands five new approaches. First, start with the end in mind: Negotiation teams should carry out a "benefit of hindsight" exercise to imagine what sorts of problems they'll have encountered 12 months down the road. Second, help your counterpart prepare. Surprise confers advantage only because the other side has no time to think through all the implications of a proposal. If they agree to something they can't deliver, it will affect you both. Third, treat alignment as a shared responsibility. After all, if the other side's interests aren't aligned, it's your problem, too. Fourth, send one unified message. Negotiators should brief implementation teams on both sides together so everyone has the same information. And fifth, manage the negotiation like a business exercise: Combine disciplined negotiation preparation with post-negotiation reviews. Above all, companies must remember that the best deals don't end at the negotiating table--they begin there.
Visionary Management: Footstone of Sustained Firm Growth.

LB Shu,SH Jia,L Peng

2004-01-01

Abstract:As an important discipline of the learning organization, vision provides guidance about what core to preserve and what future to stimulate progress toward. It had been proved by the experiences of foreign companies' Successful practice that visionary management was an actually new managerial philosophy and tool after the corporation reengineering, theory to Support sustained firm growth. It should be worthy our stated-owned enterprises and short-life's to learn and practice.
Budd-Chiari syndrome associated with the hypereosinophilic syndrome.

C. Vargas,O. Maldonado,R. Botero,L. Jeffers,T. Parker,K. Reddy,Eugene R. Schiff

Abstract:
Exploring the implications of vision, appropriateness, and execution of organizational change

Michael S. Cole,Stanley G. Harris,Jeremy B. Bernerth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730610677963

2006-07-01

Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper was to examine the interaction effects of managers' perceptions of the supporting vision clarity, appropriateness, and execution of a major organizational change on their job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intentions, and role ambiguity. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from upper and middle‐level managers of a Fortune 500 US manufacturer and maker of consumer goods involved in a large organizational change initiative. A survey was completed by 217 managers, for a response rate of 89 percent. Change attitudes, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intentions, role ambiguity, and control variables were all assessed. Findings A three‐way interaction between change vision clarity, change appropriateness, and change execution was found to predict managers' job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and role ambiguity. Research limitations/implications The study relied on self‐reports collected at one point in time, allowing for the possibility of common method bias. The complex, nonlinear relationships indicate that method bias cannot fully account for the reported relationships. Practical implications Study results illustrate that the individual experience of major change is multifaceted and that simultaneously considering the combined effects of individual's change attitudes including readiness (in the form of believing a change is needed and appropriate) and the perceived effectiveness of the change execution on key job‐related outcomes can help practitioners understand more fully the implications of organizational change. Originality/value The findings lend support to the notion that individual's sentiments concerning organizational change are interactive and should not be ignored.

management
Management's Worldview: Four Critical Points about Reality, Language, and Knowledge Building to Improve Organization Performance

Bartley J. Madden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2012.723586

IF: 2.2368

2012-11-01

Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce

Abstract:From the perspective of hindsight, many researchers have ascribed plausible reasons as to why various firms have prospered and others failed. Some have gone further and worked at understanding how a specific management viewed the world at the time decisions were being made. But, the real challenge is to make progress toward useful guideposts so management can develop a worldview that better equips them to improve firm performance in the future. Without such guideposts, organizational computing, analytics (i.e., fact-based problem solving), and other modern initiatives may lose their way or not reach their full potential for improving firm performance. In the direction of useful guideposts, this article advances four points about reality, language, and knowledge building, which have been underutilized as a means to develop insights for solving business problems and constructing viable strategies. The rationale for these four complementary points is explained in terms of the management decisions behind the growth of Walmart, the successful restructuring of IBM, and the eventual bankruptcy of Kmart. Ideally, leaders should be mindful of these points and strive to ingrain them in the firm's culture. Doing so can lead to improved effectiveness in both strategies and the systems to implement those strategies—ultimately paying dividends in terms of firm performance.

computer science, information systems, interdisciplinary applications
Relationship commitment regulation: Influencing a partner's commitment to achieve one's commitment goals

Laura V. Machia,Kenneth Tan,Christopher R. Agnew

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12986

IF: 4.6

2024-07-14

Social and Personality Psychology Compass

Abstract:We introduce a model of relationship commitment regulation, which describes how romantic partners might use empirically‐validated antecedents of commitment level strategically to influence a partner's commitment toward their relationship based on certain commitment goals they have for the relationship. People are generally aware of and relatively accurate with respect to knowing their partner's level of commitment and also have preferences regarding their desired level. We summarize key antecedents of commitment level (i.e., satisfaction level, alternative quality, investment size, future plans, and subjective norms) and then describe how each can be manipulated via relationship maintenance activities to move a partner's commitment level up or down, or maintained at a desired current level. Collectively, the model provides a strategic roadmap for actions one can take to foster desired commitment in one's partner and provides insight into the dyadic processes and outcomes of relationship maintenance.

psychology, social
Make your company a talent factory

Douglas A Ready,Jay A Conger

Abstract:Despite the great sums of money companies dedicate to talent management systems, many still struggle to fill key positions - limiting their potential for growth in the process. Virtually all the human resource executives in the authors' 2005 survey of 40 companies around the world said that their pipeline of high-potential employees was insufficient to fill strategic management roles. The survey revealed two primary reasons for this. First, the formal procedures for identifying and developing next-generation leaders have fallen out of sync with what companies need to grow or expand into new markets. To save money, for example, some firms have eliminated positions that would expose high-potential employees to a broad range of problems, thus sacrificing future development opportunities that would far outweigh any initial savings from the job cuts. Second, HR executives often have trouble keeping top leaders' attention on talent issues, despite those leaders' vigorous assertions that obtaining and keeping the best people is a major priority. If passion for that objective doesn't start at the top and infuse the culture, say the authors, talent management can easily deteriorate into the management of bureaucratic routines. Yet there are companies that can face the future with confidence. These firms don't just manage talent, they build talent factories. The authors describe the experiences of two such corporations - consumer products icon Procter & Gamble and financial services giant HSBC Group -that figured out how to develop and retain key employees and fill positions quickly to meet evolving business needs. Though each company approached talent management from a different direction, they both maintained a twin focus on functionality (rigorous talent processes that support strategic and cultural objectives) and vitality (management's emotional commitment, which is reflected in daily actions).
Blind loop: rare but important surgical complication

J. DiBianco,Robert A. Brenes,J. Palesty

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-63

2014-08-31

BMC Surgery

Abstract:
Successful change programs begin with results

R H Schaffer,H A Thomson

Abstract:Most corporate improvement programs have a negligible impact on operational and financial performance because management focuses on the activities, not the results. By initiating activities-centered programs, such as seven-step problem solving, statistical process control, and total quality management training, managers falsely assume that one day results will materialize. But because there is no explicit connection between action and outcome, improvements seldom do materialize. The authors argue for an alternative approach: results-driven improvement programs that focus on achieving specific, measurable operational improvements within a few months. While both activity-centered and results-driven programs aim to strengthen fundamental corporate competitiveness, the approaches differ dramatically. Activity-centered programs rely on broad-based policies and are more concerned with time-consuming preparations than with measurable gains. Results-driven programs, on the other hand, rely on an incremental approach to change, building on what works and discarding what doesn't. As a result, successes come quickly, and managers build their skills and gain the support of their employees for future changes. Because results-driven improvements require minimal investment, there is no excuse for postponing action. Indeed, there is always an abundance of underexploited capability and dissipated resources within the organization that management can tap into to get the program off the ground. The authors give a few pointers for how to get started: translate the long-term vision into doable but ambitious short-term goals; periodically review strategy, learning from both successes and failures; and institutionalize the changes that work and get rid of the rest.
Capitalizing on capabilities

Dave Ulrich,Norm Smallwood

Abstract:By making the most of organizational capabilities--employees' collective skills and fields of expertise--you can dramatically improve your company's market value. Although there is no magic list of proficiencies that every organization needs in order to succeed, the authors identify 11 intangible assets that well-managed companies tend to have: talent, speed, shared mind-set and coherent brand identity, accountability, collaboration, learning, leadership, customer connectivity, strategic unity, innovation, and efficiency. Such companies typically excel in only three of these capabilities while maintaining industry parity in the other areas. Organizations that fall below the norm in any of the 11 are likely candidates for dysfunction and competitive disadvantage. So you can determine how your company fares in these categories (or others, if the generic list doesn't suit your needs), the authors explain how to conduct a "capabilities audit," describing in particular the experiences and findings of two companies that recently performed such audits. In addition to highlighting which intangible assets are most important given the organization's history and strategy, this exercise will gauge how well your company delivers on its capabilities and will guide you in developing an action plan for improvement. A capabilities audit can work for an entire organization, a business unit, or a region--indeed, for any part of a company that has a strategy to generate financial or customer-related results. It enables executives to assess overall company strengths and weaknesses, senior leaders to define strategy, midlevel managers to execute strategy, and frontline leaders to achieve tactical results. In short, it helps turn intangible assets into concrete strengths.
Managing differences: the central challenge of global strategy

Pankaj Ghemawat

Abstract:The main goal of any international strategy should be to manage the large differences that arise at the borders of markets. Yet executives often fail to exploit market and production discrepancies, focusing instead on the tensions between standardization and localization. In this article, Pankaj Ghemawat presents a new framework that encompasses all three effective responses to the challenges of globalization. He calls it the AAA Triangle. The A's stand for the three distinct types of international strategy. Through adaptation, companies seek to boost revenues and market share by maximizing their local relevance. Through aggregation, they attempt to deliver economies of scale by creating regional, or sometimes global, operations. And through arbitrage, they exploit disparities between national or regional markets, often by locating different parts of the supply chain in different places--for instance, call centers in India, factories in China, and retail shops in Western Europe. Ghemawat draws on several examples that illustrate how organizations use and balance these strategies and describes the trade-offs they make as they do so. Because most enterprises should draw from all three A's to some extent, the framework can be used to develop a summary scorecard indicating how well the company is globalizing. However, given the tensions among the strategies, it's not enough simply to tick off the corresponding boxes. Strategic choice requires some degree of prioritization--and the framework can help with that as well. While it is possible to make progress on all three strategies, companies usually must focus on one or two when trying to build competitive advantage.
Managing the Non-Profit Organization

Peter Drucker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080938493

2012-10-12

Abstract:A Drucker management classic, first published in 1990, which breaks down any narrow definition of management and is aimed specifically at decision-makers and managers working in non-profit making and charitable organizations to help them apply the principles of good management to their sector. Drawing from the American experience, Drucker poignantly illustrates his discussion of management by quoting his in-depth interviews with top executives from non-profit making organizations. The issues of mission, performance, people and relationships, leadership and developing managers are eloquently discussed and Drucker provides Action Implications throughout the book which are of practical importance to the reader.
Turn public problems to private account

Rodman C Rockefeller

Abstract:Many managers face increasing calls to invest corporate resources in charitable causes. How should executives balance a firm's very real economic imperative to maximize profitability with its hypothetical moral imperative to improve society? To provide one answer, the author draws on his experience as president of an economic-development company, IBEC. Viewing profit as "an essential discipline and measure of economic success" but not "the sole corporate goal," the company actively invested in social programs that met four criteria: they served a need of the local population; they required innovative approaches; they made sense on economic grounds; and they respected the social norms of the community. Such civic-minded efforts, the author argues in this prescient 1971 article, not only improve people's lives but also create the foundation for more affluent and dynamic markets--markets that ultimately produce greater profits for business. For example, one of IBEC's earliest ventures was directed toward solving Venezuela's problems in retail food marketing. Many important items were unavailable at the small stores where people shopped. So in 1949, working with local partners, IBEC opened a supermarket. Supermarkets soon changed the food-buying habits of the nation, and the initiative helped alter patterns of food distribution and created the reliable demand needed to establish a host of local suppliers. Return on IBEC's investment, and that of its local partners, was most satisfactory, the author reports. The road to meeting a public need-especially a major one--is rarely easy, the author says. But if management sizes up the need well, there is a good chance its new venture will survive under adversity.
Demystifying the winning managerial characteristics for handling organizational paradoxes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/sd-07-2020-0136

2020-08-24

Strategic Direction

Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to review the latest management developments across the globe and pinpoint practical implications from cutting-edge research and case studies. Design/methodology/approach This briefing is prepared by an independent writer who adds their own impartial comments and places the articles in context. Findings This research paper concentrates on the impact that the managerial characteristics of age, educational background, and in-company tenure and in-role tenure have on a manager's ability to handle paradoxical priorities. The results reveal that an organization's strategic paradoxes are most effectively managed by older managers and by managers with longer tenure in their role and at the company overall. Unexpectedly, managers with an economics/business educational background were found to manage paradoxes less well than those with other educational backgrounds. Originality/value The briefing saves busy executives, strategists and researchers hours of reading time by selecting only the very best, most pertinent information and presenting it in a condensed and easy-to-digest format.
The relationship between managers’ goal-setting styles and subordinates’ goal commitment

Xander van Lill,Gerhard Roodt,Gideon P. de Bruin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v23i1.3601

2020-11-02

South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Convincing employees to set aside their self-interests and commit to collective goals is essential for the effective functioning of organisations. It is critical that the impact of different managerial goal-setting styles, and the associated impressions of fair interpersonal treatment in the workplace, is understood from subordinates' perspective. This might clarify the psychological mechanisms involved in motivating subordinates to commit to organisational goals. AIM: The primary aim of this article is to determine the relationship between managers' goal-setting styles and subordinates' goal commitment. The secondary aim is to determine whether this relationship is mediated by interactional justice. SETTING: A total of 451 working adults completed an online or paper-and-pen survey. METHODS: A mediator model was conducted in structural equation modelling with maximum likelihood estimation and Bollen-Stine bootstrapping, with 5000 bootstrap resamples, to test the hypotheses. RESULTS: The perception that managers are deliberative had the greatest positive direct relationship with subordinates' goal commitment, followed by the directive style. Subordinates' perception of managers as complaisant, in turn, were unrelated to goal commitment (amotivational), whereas the perception of managers as hostile had a negative relationship with goal commitment. Informational justice, not interpersonal justice, emerged as the only mediating variable. CONCLUSION: Managers should be encouraged to actively seek feedback from subordinates on their goal-setting styles. Managers can accordingly adapt their behaviour to effectively motivate subordinates to commit to organisational goals.

economics,management
The Secrets of Great Teamwork

Martine Haas,Mark Mortensen

Abstract:Over the years, as teams have grown more diverse, dispersed, digital, and dynamic, collaboration has become more complex. But though teams face new challenges, their success still depends on a core set of fundamentals. As J. Richard Hackman, who began researching teams in the 1970s, discovered, what matters most isn't the personalities or behavior of the team members; it's whether a team has a compelling direction, a strong structure, and a supportive context. In their own research, Haas and Mortensen have found that teams need those three "enabling conditions" now more than ever. But their work also revealed that today's teams are especially prone to two corrosive problems: "us versus them" thinking and incomplete information. Overcoming those pitfalls requires a new enabling condition: a shared mindset. This article details what team leaders should do to establish the four foundations for success. For instance, to promote a shared mindset, leaders should foster a common identity and common understanding among team members, with techniques such as "structured unstructured time." The authors also describe how to evaluate a team's effectiveness, providing an assessment leaders can take to see what's working and where there's room for improvement.

Drug therapy 1971. 6. Overdosage and poisoning.

[Estrogens for treatment of osteoporoses].

The five minds of a manager.

[Osteoclasts in bone metabolism].

Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices

Getting past yes: negotiating as if implementation mattered

Visionary Management: Footstone of Sustained Firm Growth.

Budd-Chiari syndrome associated with the hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Exploring the implications of vision, appropriateness, and execution of organizational change

Management's Worldview: Four Critical Points about Reality, Language, and Knowledge Building to Improve Organization Performance

Relationship commitment regulation: Influencing a partner's commitment to achieve one's commitment goals

Make your company a talent factory

Blind loop: rare but important surgical complication

Successful change programs begin with results

Capitalizing on capabilities

Managing differences: the central challenge of global strategy

Managing the Non-Profit Organization

Turn public problems to private account

Demystifying the winning managerial characteristics for handling organizational paradoxes

The relationship between managers’ goal-setting styles and subordinates’ goal commitment

The Secrets of Great Teamwork