Shortwave Array Spectroradiometer-Hemispheric (SAS-He): Design and Evaluation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-13
IF: 4.184
2024-03-20
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Abstract:A novel ground-based radiometer, referred to as the Shortwave Array Spectroradiometer-Hemispheric (SAS-He), is introduced. This radiometer uses the shadow band technique to report total irradiance and its direct and diffuse components frequently (every 30 sec) with continuous spectral coverage (350–1700 nm) and moderate spectral (~2.5 nm ultraviolet/visible, and ~6 nm shortwave-infrared) resolution. The SAS-He's performance is evaluated using integrated datasets collected over coastal regions during three field campaigns supported by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program, namely (1) Two-Column Aerosol Project (TCAP; Cape Cod, Massachusetts), (2) Tracking Aerosol Convection Interactions Experiment (TRACER; in and around Houston, Texas), and (3) Eastern Pacific Cloud Aerosol Precipitation Experiment (EPCAPE; La Jolla, California). We compare (i) aerosol optical depth (AOD) and total optical depth (TOD) derived from the direct irradiance, (ii) the diffuse irradiance and direct-to-diffuse ratio (DDR) calculated from two components of the total irradiance. As part of the evaluation, both AOD and TOD derived from the SASHe direct irradiance are compared to those provided by collocated Cimel sunphotometer (CSPHOT) at five (380, 440, 500, 675, 870 nm) and two (1020, 1640 nm) wavelengths, respectively. Additionally, the SAS-He diffuse irradiance and DDR are contrasted with their counterparts offered by a collocated Multi-Filter Rotating Shadowband Radiometer (MFRSR) at six (415, 500, 615, 675, 870, 1625 nm) wavelengths. Overall, reasonable agreement is demonstrated between the compared products despite the challenging observational conditions associated with varying aerosol loadings and diverse types of aerosols and clouds. The AOD- and TOD-related values of root-mean-square error are within the expected measurement uncertainty of AOD (0.01–0.02).
meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?