Abstract:Providing sufficient pollen and nectar resources to support wild pollinators over extended periods in agricultural landscapes can contribute to crop pollination and ensure high fruit weight and quality. This can be achieved by restoring natural and semi‐natural areas near crop fields with native, long‐flowering plant species. Growers and crop breeding programmes should consider selecting flowering times that coincide with periods of high diversity or abundance of native pollinators to reduce dependence on managed pollinators. Phenological overlap between crop flowering and pollinators is a crucial trait for the pollination of more than 75% of the world's crops. However, crop management rarely considers the seasonal aspect of plant–pollinator mutualism. Here, we investigate the phenological overlap between crops and pollinators and how it affects pollination and fruit production. We measured the abundance and richness of native and non‐native pollinators visiting raspberry flowers at two different times during the flowering season (i.e. early and late flowering periods) and examined their effects on crop yield in 16 fields. The community of pollinators foraging on raspberry flowers was more diverse and dominated by native pollinators during the early flowering period when most native plant species were flowering. Later in the season, when native flower resources declined in the surrounding environment, raspberry flowers were visited mainly by two non‐native bees: managed honeybees and the invasive bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Pollinator contribution to raspberry yield was twice as high in the early flowering period compared to the late period (61% vs. 31% increase in drupelet set respectively). Flower damage caused by extremely high visitation frequencies by non‐native bees in the late period was six times higher than in the early flowering period (30% vs. 5% of damaged flowers respectively). Synthesis and applications. Providing sufficient pollen and nectar resources to support wild pollinators over extended periods in agricultural landscapes can contribute to crop pollination and ensure high fruit weight and quality. This can be achieved by restoring natural and semi‐natural areas near crop fields with native, long‐flowering plant species. Growers and crop breeding programmes should consider selecting flowering times that coincide with periods of high diversity or abundance of native pollinators to reduce dependence on managed pollinators. Resumen La coincidencia temporal entre los polinizadores y la floración de los cultivos es un rasgo fundamental para la correcta polinización de más de 75% de los cultivos del mundo. Sin embargo, el manejo de los cultivos raramente considera el aspecto temporal del mutualismo planta‐polinizador. Aquí, exploramos el solapamiento fenológico entre un cultivo y sus polinizadores, y cómo este afecta la polinización y producción de frutos. Para ello, medimos la abundancia y riqueza de polinizadores tanto nativos como no‐nativos que se encontraban visitando las flores del cultivo de frambuesa durante sus dos floraciones (i.e., temprana y tardía) y evaluamos sus efectos en la producción de fruta en 16 campos. La comunidad de polinizadores visitando las flores del cultivo de frambuesa fue más diverso, y dominado por polinizadores nativos, durante la floración temprana, cuando en el paisaje había mayoría de especies de plantas nativas en flor. Durante la floración tardía de la frambuesa los recursos florales nativos declinaron en el ambiente, y las flores de la frambuesa fueron visitadas mayormente por dos especies no‐nativas de polinizadores: la abeja manejada de la miel y el abejorro invasor Bombus terrestris. La contribución de los polinizadores en la producción del cultivo fue el doble en la floración temprana en comparación con la floración tardía (61% vs. 31% de aumento en el set de drupas, respectivamente). El daño floral causado por frecuencias de visitas muy altas de abejas no‐nativas fue seis veces mayor en la floración tardía en comparación con la temprana (30% vs. 5% de daño floral, respectivamente). Síntesis y aplicaciones. Proveer de recursos florales como néctar y polen para promover polinizadores silvestres durante largos períodos en el paisaje agrícola puede contribuir a la polinización de cultivos y así asegurar altos rendimientos. Esto se puede lograr restaurando los hábitats naturales y semi‐naturales que se encuentran próximos a los cultivos con plantas nativas, de larga floración. Adicionalmente, tanto los agricultores como los programas de mejoramiento de cultivos deberían considerar la selección del momento de floración del cultivo para que coincida con los períodos de alta diversidad y abundancia de polinizadores nativos, con el fin de reducir la dependencia de polinizadores manejados.

The specialised buzz pollination syndrome poses a partial barrier to plant invasions

Buzz-world: Global patterns and drivers of buzzing bees and poricidal plants

Insect herbivory but not plant pathogen infection drive floral volatile‐mediated indirect effects on pollinators and plant fitness in Brassica rapa

Phenological overlap between crop and pollinators: Contrasting influence of native and non‐native bees on raspberry fruits over the flowering season

Potential contribution to the invasion process of different reproductive strategies of two invasive roses

Competition and pollen wars: simulations reveal the dynamics of competition mediated through heterospecific pollen transfer by non-flower constant insects

Direct interactions between invasive plants and native pollinators: evidence, impacts and approaches

Exotic insect pollinators and native pollination systems

The fate of pollen in two morphologically contrasting buzz-pollinated Solanum flowers

Evidence of introduced honeybees (Apis mellifera) as pollen wasters in orchid pollination

Blooming characteristics and breeding system of an invasive plant Gaura parviflora

Reciprocal Heterospecific Pollen Interference among Alien and Native Species

Weed Role for Pollinator in the Agroecosystem: Plant-Insect Interactions and Agronomic Strategies for Biodiversity Conservation

The invasive bumblebee Bombus terrestris (Linnaeus, 1758) disrupts the adaptive function of heteranthery by indiscriminately visiting the pollinating and feeding anthers of Senna arnottiana flowers

Knowing the invader: increasing knowledge about an invasive plant to improve management

Pollinators contribute to the maintenance of flowering plant diversity

Mosquito pollination of plants: an overview of their role and an assessment of the possible contribution of disease vectors

Managed honeybee hives negatively affect the reproduction of native plants in a dryland nature reserve

Pollinator intraspecific body size variation and sociality influence their interactions with plants

Intraspecific variation of scent and its impact on pollinators’ preferences

High floral disparity without pollinator shifts in buzz‐bee‐pollinated Melastomataceae