An automated methodology for whole-body, multimodality tracking of individual cancer lesions

Victor Santoro-Fernandes,Daniel T Huff,Luciano Rivetti,Alison Deatsch,Brayden Schott,Scott Perlman,Robert Jeraj

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad31c6

IF: 3.5

2024-03-09

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Abstract:Objective: Manual analysis of individual cancer lesions to assess disease response is clinically impractical and requires automated lesion tracking methodologies. However, no methodology has been developed for whole-body individual lesion tracking, across an arbitrary number of scans, and acquired with various imaging modalities. Approach: This study introduces a lesion tracking methodology and benchmarked it using 23 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and PET/MR images of eight neuroendocrine tumor patients. The methodology consists of six steps: (1) Alignment of multiple scans via image registration, (2) Body-part labeling, (3) Automatic lesion-wise dilation, (4) Clustering of lesions based on local lesion shape metrics, (5) Assignment of lesion tracks, and (6) Output of a lesion graph. Registration performance was evaluated via landmark distance, lesion matching accuracy was evaluated between each image pair, and lesion tracking accuracy was evaluated via identical track ratio. Sensitivity studies were performed to evaluate the impact of lesion dilation (fixed vs. automatic dilation), anatomic location, image modalities (inter- vs. intra-modality), registration mode (direct vs. indirect registration), and track size (number of time-points and lesions) on lesion matching and tracking performance. Main Results: Manual contouring yielded 956 lesions, 1,570 lesion-matching decisions, and 493 lesion tracks. The median residual registration error was 2.5 mm. The automatic lesion dilation led to 0.90 overall lesion matching accuracy, and an 88% identical track ratio. The methodology is robust regarding anatomic locations, image modalities, and registration modes. The number of scans had a moderate negative impact on the identical track ratio (94% for 2 scans, 91% for 3 scans, and 81% for 4 scans). The number of lesions substantially impacted the identical track ratio (93% for 2 nodes vs. 54% for ≥5 nodes). Significance: The developed methodology resulted in high lesion-matching accuracy and enables automated lesion tracking in PET/CT and PET/MR.

engineering, biomedical,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging