Abstract:Introduction: Today, 50% of people with cardiac disease do not participate in rehabilitation. The HeRTA-study aims to develop and test a sustainable rehabilitation model supporting vulnerable patients in participating in rehabilitation and long-term physical activity. Methods: A feasibility study with a non-blinded pilot randomized trial was developed in collaboration with partners and cardiac patients to test a multi-component rehabilitation intervention across hospital, municipality, and civil society. The study runs from January 2020 to December 2024. Eligibility criteria for participants: a) diagnosed with either ischemic heart disease, persistent atrial fibrillation, heart failure, or have had cardiac valve surgery, b) residents in Hvidovre Hospitals uptake area, c) cognitively functional, d) physically able to participate in rehabilitation. Patient recruitment will be located at Hvidovre Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark, data collection at Hvidovre Hospital, Rehabilitation Center Albertslund, the Danish Heart Association, and in two municipalities (Hvidovre and Brøndby). Patients in the control group have access to usual care at the hospital: rehabilitation-needs-assessment, patient education, and physical training. After or instead of hospital rehabilitation, the patient can be referred to municipal rehabilitation with patient education, and a total of 12 weeks of physical training across sectors. Patients in the intervention group will in addition to usual care, have access to an information book about cardiac disease, patient supporters from the Danish Heart Association, Information materials to inform employers about the employees' rehabilitation participation, a rehabilitation goal setting plan, a support café for relatives, and follow-up phone calls from physiotherapists 1 and 3 months after rehabilitation to support physical activities. Patients with vulnerabilities will additionally receive patient education conducted in small groups, pro-active counselling by a cardiac nurse, psychologist, or social worker, paid transportation to rehabilitation, and paid membership in a sports association. Patients are computer block-randomized so patients with vulnerability are distributed evenly in the two study arms by stratifying on a) a cut-off score of ≥ 5 in the Tilburg Frailty Indicator questionnaire and/or b) need of language translator support. A power calculation, based on an estimated 20% difference in participation proportion between groups, 80% power, a type 1 error of 5% (two-tailed), results in 91 participants in each study arm. The primary outcome: rehabilitation participation (attending ≥ two activities: patient education, smoking cessation, dietary counseling, and physical training) and reaching at least 50% attendance. Secondary outcomes: health-related quality of life, coping strategies, level of physical activities, and sustainability regarding participation in active communities after rehabilitation. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05104658). Results: Differences between changes in outcomes between groups will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Sensitivity analysis and analysis of the effect of the combined activities will be made. A process evaluation will clarify the implementation of the model, the partnership, and patients' experiences. Conclusion: Cross-sectoral collaborations between hospitals, municipalities, and organizations in civil society may lead to sustainable and affordable long-term physical activities for persons with chronic illness. The results can lead to improve cross-sectoral collaborations in other locations and patient groups.

The attend-PE model: A feasibility study of a structured follow-up care model for patients with pulmonary embolism.

Development of A structured integrated post-Pulmonary Embolism care model: The Attend-PE model

Experiences, perspectives, and practice patterns of pulmonary embolism follow-up in Denmark. A mixed method study informing the development of A sTrucTurEd INtegrateD post PE care model

Patient engagement in pulmonary embolism research: Insights form the Attend-PE study

Effect of a Physiotherapist-Guided Home-Based Exercise Intervention on Physical Capacity and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Pulmonary rehabilitation to improve physical capacity, dyspnea, and quality of life following pulmonary embolism (the PeRehab study): study protocol for a two-center randomized controlled trial

Outpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Persisting Symptoms after Pulmonary Embolism

Performance-based outcome measures for assessing physical capacity in patients with pulmonary embolism: A scoping review

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and impairment after pulmonary embolism: the FOCUS study

Estimated annual healthcare costs after acute pulmonary embolism: results from a prospective multicentre cohort study

Efficacy and safety of a 12-week outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program in Post-PE Syndrome

Prognosis of patients with pulmonary embolism after rehabilitation

Diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prediction model based on a patient data meta-analysis

Identification of hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism at high risk for death: external validation of different models

A novel referral strategy to enhance the enrollment of patients with heart failure in cardiac rehabilitation: A feasibility study

Post-Pulmonary Embolism Syndrome and Functional Outcomes after Acute Pulmonary Embolism

When I treat a patient with acute pulmonary embolism at home

Quality of Life 3 and 12 Months Following Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Analysis From a Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Modelling costs of interventional pulmonary embolism treatment: implications of US trends for a European healthcare system

Heart Rehabilitation for All (HeRTA): Protocol for a feasibility study and pilot randomized trial