[Results and prospects of computers in psychiatry].

P. Pichot,H. Debray,J. Dreyfus

1971-06-01

Annales Medico-Psychologiques

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Intelligent Processing

K. Markov,P. Stanchev,K. Ivanova,I. Mitov,V M Glushkov,Editors

Abstract:Papers are peer reviewed and are selected from the several International Conferences, which were part of the Joint International Events of Informatics "ITA 2009" – summer session, Varna, Bulgaria. 3 PREFACE The scope of the International Book Series " Information Science and Computing " (IBS ISC) covers the area of Informatics and Computer Science. It is aimed to support growing collaboration between scientists from all over the world. IBS ISC is official publisher of the works of the members of the ITHEA International Scientific Society. The official languages of the IBS ISC are English and Russian. IBS ISC welcomes scientific papers and books connected with any information theory or its application. IBS ISC rules for preparing the manuscripts are compulsory.
Progression of Research of Posterior Screw Fixation on Atlas

YANG Di,CHEN Qi-xin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2006.03.040

2006-01-01

Abstract:Posterior screw fixation on atlas includes posterior screw fixation within lateral mass of atlas and in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass.Atlas is anatomically capable for screw fixation in its lateral mass and via its posterior arch and lateral mass.But it is necessary to pay attention to the thickness of the posterior arch at the thinnest part of the groove and avoid injuring the vertebral artery and the internal carotid artery.Routine lateral radiographs and CT scans of the cervical spines of patients must be performed before surgery,which can be of definite help in locating the entry point and regulating the screw direction.The screws have good pullout strength(even when placed unicortically),and constructs using C_1 lateral mass screws and C_2 pars screws connected with rods are as stable as transarticular screws with posterior wire-graft constructs.At present there are three popular techniques:the Harms technique,as well as Xia and Gupta,which is screw fixation within lateral mass of atlas,and the Tan and Ma technique,which are both screw fixation in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass.Clinical results showed that posterior screw fixation on atlas could relieve spinal and neural oppression immediately,improve clinical symptoms,have good immediate postoperative stability,keep the movement of occipitocervical region,and showed its advantages in very high successful fusion rate,and very few instrument failure,morbidity and complications.
[The Use of Lateral Mass Screws and Pedicle Screws for the Treatment of Injury of Lower Cervical Spine].

Xue-Ling Zhao,Hong-Bin Zhao,Bin Wang,Lin-Zhi Li,Xiao-Song Zhu,Chun-Qiang Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn.0529-5815.2005.04.004

2005-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE To discuss the effect of the use of the cervical lateral mass plates screws and T(1) pedicle screws for the treatment of C(6) to C(7) injury through posterior approach. METHODS There were 8 patients in the study group; Each of them had been injured with low cervical spine C(6) or C(7). There were 6 cases with C(6)-C(7) injury and 2 cases with C(7) injury. According to ASIA classification, 3 cases were in grade C and 5 cases in D. The lateral mass screws were placed on the lateral masses using Margel technique. Lamina or facet bone allografting were used to achieve a long-term stability. RESULTS All 8 patients were followed up from 5 to 37 months (mean 15 months). No operative death occurred. There were no cord or vertebral artery injury, cerebrospinal fluid leak, nerve roots injury, screw malposition or back out, loose of alignment or implant failure. Clinical symptom and ASIA classification were improved in all patients. Postoperative MRI scanning confirmed satisfactory screw placement in all cases. CONCLUSION This technique is safe and benefit to patients with low cervical spine C(6) or C(7) injury.
Decompressive cervical laminectomy and lateral mass screw-rod arthrodesis. Surgical analysis and outcome

Moh'd M Al Barbarawi,Ziad A Audat,Moutasem M Obeidat,Tareq M Qudsieh,Waleed F Dabbas,Mouness H Obaidat,Anas A Malkawi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-6-10

2011-05-19

Scoliosis

Abstract:BackgroundThis study evaluates the outcome and complications of decompressive cervical Laminectomy and lateral mass screw fixation in 110 cases treated for variable cervical spine pathologies that included; degenerative disease, trauma, neoplasms, metabolic-inflammatory disorders and congenital anomalies.MethodsA retrospective review of total 785 lateral mass screws were placed in patients ages 16-68 years (40 females and 70 males). All cases were performed with a polyaxial screw-rod construct and screws were placed by using Anderson-Sekhon trajectory. Most patients had 12-14-mm length and 3.5 mm diameter screws placed for subaxial and 28-30 for C1 lateral mass. Screw location was assessed by post operative plain x-ray and computed tomography can (CT), besides that; the facet joint, nerve root foramen and foramen transversarium violation were also appraised.ResultsNo patients experienced neural or vascular injury as a result of screw position. Only one patient needed screw repositioning. Six patients experienced superficial wound infection. Fifteen patients had pain around the shoulder of C5 distribution that subsided over the time. No patients developed screw pullouts or symptomatic adjacent segment disease within the period of follow up.Conclusiondecompressive cervical spine laminectomy and Lateral mass screw stabilization is a technique that can be used for a variety of cervical spine pathologies with safety and efficiency.
Evaluating laminar and lateral mass screw techniques in cervical injury management: A case series

Singkat Dohar Apul Lumban Tobing,Ichsan Dana Patih,Filberto Budhy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110311

Abstract:Introduction and importance: The cervical spine is a dynamic structure that protects adjacent nervous innervation and maintains the range of motion (ROM) of the head and neck. Fractures in this area can lead to high mortality and morbidity, with bone fractures accounting for 56 % of cervical spinal cord injuries. This case series presents a series of cervical pathologies treated with posterior decompression and stabilization using laminar and lateral mass screw fixation. Methods: This research is a case series of four patients treated with laminar and lateral mass screw technique. All patients received a surgical procedure, including posterior compression and stabilization, which included the use of a laminar and lateral mass screw. We followed the patient for 12 months. During follow up, outcome measures consisting of VAS, range of motion, neurological status, ODI Score, SF-12 Score and any complications related to the surgical procedure was recorded and calculated every 3 months. Outcomes: This series examines four distinct cases. The initial case pertained to a female patient, aged 72, who exhibited tetraparesis resulting from a burst fracture occurring in the C3-C5 vertebrae. The underlying etiology of this pathology is considered to be mineral bone disease associated with thyroid hormone imbalance due to thyroid cancer. The second instance was a 14-year-old child experiencing neck pain due to spondylitis tuberculosis in the C1-C2 region, accompanied by a retropharyngeal abscess and occipitocervical dissociation (OCD) with basilar invagination. The third example pertained to a patient who is 9 years old and presented with weakness in all extremities due to C1 fracture-dislocation. The fourth case was a 14-year-old patient who experienced a fall from a bunk bed. This patient was diagnosed with Traumatic Atlantoaxial dislocation with odontoid fracture Type II. All patients showed improved cervical curvature and range of motion with the advantages of reduction of intraoperative haemorrhage, as well as a decrease in postoperative rehabilitation duration. Overall, the data shows a general trend of improvement in VAS and ODI scores over time, with SF-12 scores stabilizing or slightly decreasing by 12 months post-operation. Conclusion: The use of a lateral mass screw for subaxial cervical injuries can be employed to manage cervical spine pathologies like fractures and infections, including spondylitis TB. However, more research is required to evaluate the long-term complications and success rates of this technique.
Biomechanical Differences Between Transfacet and Lateral Mass Screw-Rod Constructs for Multilevel Posterior Cervical Spine Stabilization

Firoz Miyanji,Andrew Mahar,Richard Oka,Peter Newton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318184ace8

IF: 3.241

2008-11-01

Spine

Abstract:STUDY DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical investigation using human cadaveric cervical spines.OBJECTIVE: Evaluate differences in biomechanical stability between typical lateral mass screw + rod constructs compared to transfacet screw fixation with and without rods.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lateral mass screw + rod constructs have reported efficacious arthrodesis rates/quality but risk damaging the lateral neurovascular structures. Transfacet screw fixation has been studied in the lumbar spine, but little data exists regarding its potential utility in the cervical spine.METHODS: Sixteen human cadaveric cervical spines were stripped of soft tissue leaving the occiput and ligamentous structures intact. Spines were randomized to lateral mass or transfacet groups (n = 8/group). Spines were prepared in typical surgical fashion and instrumented with the appropriate devices. In the case of the transfacet constructs, the occiput was left intact to simulate the potential surgical difficulty of screw insertion. The transfacet screw group was initially instrumented with rods. Once instrumented (C3-C6) for each group, spines were further dissected to isolate the instrumented levels. End vertebral bodies were rigidly fixed and constructs biomechanically tested in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion between +/-2 Nm. After testing for the transfacet screw + rod group, rods were removed and spines retested. All instrumentation was then removed and spines tested in their destabilized state as would occur with surgical preparation. Stiffness data were calculated for each test direction for all groups. Raw and normalized data were each compared across techniques with a 1-way ANOVA (P < 0.05).RESULTS: The transfacet screw groups (with and without rods) were found to have statistically similar biomechanical stability to lateral mass screw + rod constructs for each test direction.CONCLUSION: Transfacet screws (without rods) were found to have similar biomechanical stability compared to typical lateral mass screw + rod constructs. However, transfacet fixation eliminates the risk to the neurovascular structures and lowers the overall implant profile.

clinical neurology,orthopedics
Biomechanical Evaluation of Transfacet Screw Fixation for Stabilization of Multilevel Cervical Corpectomies

Yu-Po Lee,Claire Robertson,Andrew Mahar,Mark Kuper,Deborah S. Lee,Gilad J. Regev,Steven R. Garfin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0b013e3181eebb26

2011-06-01

Abstract:STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric biomechanical investigation.OBJECTIVES: To test the feasibility of transfacet screws as a minimally invasive posterior fixation device for the cervical spine by comparing the biomechanical stability of transfacet screws to lateral mass screws and rods in a multilevel cervical corpectomy model.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of the spine has gained increasing acceptance and popularity. However, a minimally invasive means of instrumenting the posterior cervical spine has yet to be discovered. Posterior transfacet screws have been described as a means of posterior fixation. In addition, they have the potential of being placed percutaneously through stab incisions. However, validation of transfacet screws in an unstable cervical model in which posterior instrumentation may be necessary has not been carried out till date.METHODS: Sixteen cadaveric cervical spines were randomized to transfacet or lateral mass instrumentation groups. The spines were tested in the following conditions: (a) intact, (b) after multilevel corpectomies with strut graft placement with stand-alone posterior fixation, and (c) with an additional anterior plate over the strut graft. Corpectomy site loading was measured with a custom-designed strut graft. Data were collected for spinal stiffness, range of motion, and strut graft loading, and was analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance (P<0.05).RESULTS: Stand-alone transfacet screw fixation was found to provide inferior spinal stability and resulted in increased spinal motion and graft loading compared with the other constructs (P<0.05 for all).CONCLUSIONS: It is unclear what kind of mechanical stiffness is necessary to stabilize the cervical spine and obtain solid fusion. However, decreased stability and increased graft loading suggest that transfacet screws may not be the ideal method of posterior fixation to supplement multilevel anterior cervical corpectomies and fusions despite their potential as a minimally invasive method for posterior cervical instrumentation.
Lower Cervical Spine Injury Treated with Lateral Mass Plates and Pedicle Screws Through Posterior Approach.

Xue-ling Zhao,Hong-bin Zhao,Bin Wang,Xiao-song Zhu,Lin-zhi Li,Chun-qiang Zhang

2005-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To treat injury of the lower cervical spine C6 to C7 with cervical lateral mass plates and T1 pedicle screws through posterior approach.METHODS:The data of 8 patients with lower cervical spine C6 or C7 injury (6 patients with fracture and dislocation in C6 and C7 and 2 with fracture in C7) were analyzed retrospectively in this study. For the preoperative American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification, Grade C was found in 3 cases and Grade D in 5 cases. Screws were placed on the lateral masses and the first thoracic pedicle with Margerl technique. Lamina or facet bone allografting was used to achieve a long-term stability.RESULTS:All the 8 patients were followed up for 5-37 months (mean: 15 months). No operative death occurred. There were no examples of aggravation of spinal cord injury or vertebral artery injury, cerebrospinal fluid leak, nerve roots injury, screw malposition or back-out, loose of alignment or implant failure. Clinical symptoms and ASIA classification were improved in all the patients. Postoperative MRI scanning confirmed the satisfactory screw placement in all the cases.CONCLUSIONS:Lateral mass plates and pedicle screws through posterior approach are safe and beneficial for patients with lower cervical spine C6 or C7 injury.
Single use of transarticular screws in atlantoaxial instability

Jian-wei RUAN,Jian CHEN,Shun-wu FAN

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0253-2352.2008.09.012

2008-01-01

Abstract:Objective To research the biomechanical characteristics and clinical applicant of posterior transarticular screws (Magerl technique) with bene graft in atlantoaxial instability.Methods 30 fresh cadaver human cervical spine specimens were obtained and randomized subdivided into 5 groups:intact group,atlantoaxial destabilized group,atlantoaxial destabilized and fixed with pedicle screws group,fixed with Magerl screws group and fixed with Maged screws combined with Brooks way group.ROM(range of motion)and NZ(neutral zone)of extend,flex,right and left lateral bend,right and left rotation of each specimen in 5 groups were measured.Transarticular screws were placed in 23 patients with atlantoaxial instability from 2000 Feb.to 2005 Jan.,with 16 males and 7 females,age from 17 to 62 years.20 of them were traumatic dislocation and 3 were congenital instable.Results Biomechanical study indicated that stability of all 6 degrees were Magerl+Brooks＞Magerl screws＞Pedicle screws＞Intact＞Destabilized.23 patient were fixed with 46 Maged screws in total,none were suffered from vertebral artery injury and neurological deterioration.All patients were followed-up from 4 to 36 months.2 of them complained that difficult in rotation of head.Conclusion Single use of Magerl screw can provide enough biomechanical stable for adantoaxial instability,and is an effective,low-risky way combined with intra-spinal-process bone graft.
Management of hangman’s fracture with percutaneous transpedicular screw fixation

Yao-Sen Wu,Yan Lin,Xiao-Lei Zhang,Nai-feng Tian,Liao-Jun Sun,Hua-Zi Xu,Yong-Long Chi,Zhi-jun Pan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2578-3

IF: 2.721

2012-01-01

European Spine Journal

Abstract:Purpose This study describes a percutaneous technique for C2 transpedicular screw fixation and evaluates its safety and efficacy in the treatment of patients with hangman’s fracture. Methods Ten patients with hangman’s fracture were treated by percutaneous C2 transpedicular screw fixation. There are six males and four females, who were, based on the classification of Levine and Edwards, sorted as follows: type I fracture, three cases; type II, five cases; type IIa, two cases. The causes of injury were road traffic accident in six patients and falling injury in four patients. Other associated lesions included rib fractures (7 patients), head injuries (4 patients), and fractures of extremities (6 patients). Results The new technique was performed successfully in all cases. The average operation time was 98 min (range 60–130 min) and the estimated blood loss was 25 ml (range 15–40 ml). No complications such as vascular or neural structures injuries were found intraoperatively. Postoperative CT scans demonstrated that 17 (85 %) of 20 screws were placed satisfactorily, and 3 (15 %) screws showed perforations of the pedicle wall (<2 mm). These patients were asymptomatic and no further intervention was required postoperatively. After 8–25 months follow-up (mean 15.3 months), solid fusion was demonstrated by computed tomography. All cases got well-sagittal alignment and no angulation or dislocation was found at the segment of C2–C3. There was no loss of fixation. Clinical examination showed a full range of motion in the neck in all patients. Conclusions The fluoroscopically assisted percutaneous C2 transpedicular screw fixation method is a technically feasible and minimally invasive technique for hangman’s fracture.
Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive posterior cervical fusion: a single center, single surgeon retrospective review

George A Crabill,Kaleb Derouen,Kierany B Shelvin,John M Wilson,Gabriel C Tender

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjae559

2024-09-15

Abstract:Standard posterior cervical fusion is a common surgical technique that utilizes lateral mass screws and rods for fixation. A relatively new, minimally invasive technique involving interfacet decortication and placement of spacers has shown promise in terms of outcomes. We sought to determine fusion rates and complications of this new technique at our institution to bolster current literature. We retrospectively reviewed all patients that underwent a 3-level or less minimally invasive posterior cervical fusions by a single surgeon. Patients were evaluated to determine fusion rates and postoperative complications. Twenty-eight patients underwent minimally invasive posterior cervical fusion. Twenty-seven demonstrated fusion (96%). One patient that underwent the procedure for juxta-fusional disease required additional surgery for pseudoarthrosis. The minimally invasive posterior cervical technique results in favorable fusion rates and has low complication rates. Our study strengthens current literature that this minimally invasive technique is a safe and effective alternative.
Minimally Invasive Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adjacent Segment Disease after Posterior Lumbar Fusion

Jian‐jun Ma,Shun‐wu Fan,Feng‐dong Zhao,Xiang‐qian Fang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12095

2014-01-01

Orthopaedic Surgery

Abstract:Posterior lumbar fusion is a popular technique for managing lumbar spine degenerative diseases including disc hernia, canal stenosis, scoliosis, spondylosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. One of the commonest complications is adjacent segment disease (ASD). About 4.7% patients who have undergone lumbar fusion need revision surgery for ASD1. There are various revision procedures; they include anterior and posterior approaches. Due to the previous posterior procedure, the risks of a posterior revision approach are obviously high and include dural tear injury, nerve root injury, and secondary damage to posterior structures. Thus, a retroperitoneal approach to performing minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) would avoid all the risks mentioned above and might therefore be a better treatment option2, 3. A 45-year-old female had undergone posterior lumbar interbody fusion at the L3–4 to L4–5 level and posterolateral fusion of the L5S1 level 6 months previously for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine in a local hospital with an initially satisfactory outcome. However, five months after this surgery, she had developed progressive low back pain with numbness and tingling throughout her right leg. Careful physical examination showed tenderness on the right side of the L5 spinous process. She had a positive Lasègue sign and straight leg raising test in the right leg. There was also decreased sensation over the lateral aspect of the leg, lateral malleolus and lateral aspect of the foot. Plantar flexion was weaker in her right foot than in her left. The ankle jerk was reduced on the right side. Routine laboratory investigations were normal. X-ray films revealed that L3–S1 had been fixed with pedicle screws and there were cages in the L3–4 and L4–5 interspaces. Osteolysis was noted around the pedicle screws in the S1 vertebral body. MRI revealed disc herniation on the right side at the L5S1 level. Therefore, the preoperative diagnosis was disc herniation of L5S1 and ASD (L5S1). ALIF with an integrated titanium plate and a poly(ether-ether-ketone) (PEEK) cage (SynFix-LR, Synthes, Solothurn, Switzerland) was planned. To avoid vessel injury and identify an appropriate operating area, computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the abdominal aorta was performed preoperatively. After induction of general anesthesia, the patient was positioned supine on a table with a break at the level of the lumbar spine to exaggerate lumbosacral lordosis. A Pfannenstiel incision was made between the level of the umbilicus and symphysis pubis. The left side of the rectus sheath was dissected parallel to the midline and the left rectus abdominis was retracted laterally, after which the retroperitoneal space was entered by retracting all the periosteum to the right4. After the L5S1 level had been exposed and fluoroscopically verified, a SynFrame Retractor System (Synthes) was used to create a stable surgical field5. Before performing discectomy, the median sacral vessels were carefully ligatured or electrocoagulated. Then an adequate discectomy was performed6 and the nerve root was carefully decompressed. The adjacent vertebral endplates were scratched appropriately. After a trial cage had been tested, an appropriately sized cage with allograft was inserted into the intervertebral space. The cage was anchored by four diverging angle-stable locking screws into the adjacent vertebrae and its position was fluoroscopically confirmed. The operation time was 110 min with an estimated blood loss of 120 mL. The duration of hospitalization was 7 days. With the improved PEEK cage integrated with a titanium locking plate and four angle-stable screws (SynFix-LR, Synthes), stand-alone ALIF can meet the biomechanical needs of lumbar fusion7, 8. The improved cage is biomechanically superior to cages with separate plates9 and has a zero profile construct, which reduces the rates of vessel and visceral organ injury. The SynFrame Retractor System provides a more stable operative field and allows a smaller skin incision, reducing the risk of vessel and organ injury during the procedure5. A preoperative CTA of the abdominal aorta and careful handling of median sacral vessels increase the safety of this procedure. This technique facilitates more direct discectomy and more complete nerve decompression and involves a larger cage which results in higher fusion rates10. As a revision for ASD after posterior lumbar fusion, ALIF offers direct anterior column support without disturbing the posterior scars around the dural sac and nerve roots. It also shortens operative time and thus expedites patient recovery. Video Clip S1. Mini-invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Posterior Cervical Pedicle Screw-Rod/plate Instrumentation Combined with Unilateral Open-Door Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Compression Injury: Report of Five Cases

Li Zhang,Yu Sun,Yongchong Jiang,Yong Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.15052-15.1

2018-01-01

Turkish Neurosurgery

Abstract:All patients were acute, multi-segment cervical spinal cord compression injury secondary to subaxial cervical spine fracture. These patients underwent emergency posterior cervical pedicle screw-rod/plate instrumentation combined with unilateral open-door laminoplasty. Well-placed pedicle screws and good cervical canal dilation were achieved in all patients, as assessed by radiography. Patients were followed up for 6-10 months and showed at least one class improvement in spinal impairment. These cases suggest that simple posterior cervical pedicle screw-rod/plate instrumentation combined with extensive unilateral open-door laminoplasty could repair acute, multi-segment cervical spinal cord compression injury secondary to subaxial cervical spine fracture if the cervical spine sequence is well preserved and does not require restoration.
Spinous Process Screw Fixation: A Salvage Technique in Subaxial Cervical Spinal Instrumentation

Yinglun Tian,Nanfang Xu,Huijie Leng,Shenglin Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.059

IF: 2.21

2021-01-01

World Neurosurgery

Abstract:-OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of spinous process screws in subaxial cervical fixation. -METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 7 patients receiving posterior cervical instrumentation for subaxial fracture dislocation or atlantoaxial dislocation from 2014 to 2015. In addition, a biomechanical test was performed on 7 fresh-frozen cadaveric spine samples (from the occiput to C7) from healthy human subjects with no history of spinal trauma. And lastly, the potential trajec-tories of cervical spinous process screws of 100 adults were measured through axial computed tomography in order to establish the general rule for applicability of this technique. -RESULTS: Rigid fixation and solid fusion were achieved in all 7 patients included in the study. Biomechanical test results revealed no significant difference between bilat-eral lateral mass screw fixation and the hybrid lateral mass and spinous process screw fixation constructs. Measurement of the potential trajectory suggested that spinous process screw fixation was a viable technique in the subaxial cervical spine in the general population. -CONCLUSIONS: The spinous process screw fixation technique in the subaxial cervical spine is a viable and effective salvage option for patients in whom conventional posterior fixations were not sufficient and salvage, sup-plementary techniques were required.
Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy: a biomechanical study

Kern Singh,Alexander R Vaccaro,Jesse Kim,Eric P Lorenz,Tae-Hong Lim,Howard S An

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200404150-00005

2004-04-15

Abstract:Study design: An in vitro biomechanical study of various reconstructive techniques following decompression of the spondylotic cervical spine. OBJECTIVE.: To evaluate the biomechanical stability of anterior cervical plate fixation following three strategies of decompression for multilevel cervical spondylosis (three levels) of the cervical spine: three level discectomy, single corpectomy and discectomy, and a two-level corpectomy. Summary of background data: The main goals of surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy include adequate decompression and stabilization while maintaining or restoring cervical lordosis. Cervical decompression is often performed through a corpectomy followed by strut-graft reconstruction. An anterior cervical plate with end-fixation (two points of fixation) is then used to span the construct. The authors propose an alternative to multilevel corpectomy and long-segment end construct plate fixation. Often times, the cervical stenosis is confined to the area of the degenerative discs. As a result, the authors feel that either multilevel discectomy or a corpectomy combined with discectomy followed by segmental plate fixation may provide adequate decompression with increased biomechanical rigidity as compared to cervical plate-constructs with end-fixation only. Methods: Seven human cadaveric fresh-frozen cervical spines from C1-T1 were utilized. Three-dimensional motion analysis with an optical tracking device was used to determine motion following various reconstruction methods. All seven cervical spines underwent testing in a randomized order. The end construct model consisted of a corpectomy at C4 and C5 with a polymethyl methacrylate strut graft and an anterior cervical PEAK (DePuy-AcroMed) plate. The two segmental constructs also utilized the PEAK plate with one construct undergoing discectomies at C3-C4, C4-C5, and C5-C6 with polymethyl methacrylate interbody grafts and the other segmental construct undergoing a discectomy at C3-C4 and a corpectomy of C5. All specimens underwent a pure moment application of 2 Nm with regards to flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. RESULTS.: The three-level discectomy and combined one-level discectomy and corpectomy with segmental fixation was significantly more rigid in flexion-extension and lateral bending than the two-level corpectomy with end-construct plate fixation (P < 0.05). There was no increase in stability during extension between the end construct (two-level corpectomy) reconstruction model and the un-instrumented corpectomy and grafted specimen. No difference was noted between the segmental constructs and the end-construct with regards to axial rotation. Conclusions: Cervical myelopathy is traditionally treated with a multilevel corpectomy and an end-construct plate fixation spanning the strut graft. A large moment arm is generated at the ends of the construct, potentially leading to plate migration or dislodgment. Often times, adequate decompression can be achieved with either a multilevel discectomy or a combined discectomy and corpectomy with segmental plate fixation. This study clearly demonstrates that segmental plate fixation affords a more biomechanically rigid method of reconstruction with regards to flexion-extension and lateral bending than end-construct plate fixation. The increased rigidity afforded by segmental fixation may significantly decrease the likelihood of plate dislodgement in the setting of anterior instrumentation alone following anterior alone, long segment reconstruction procedures.
Pars interarticularis screws for posterior cervical fusion - investigating a new trajectory using a CT-based multiplanar reconstruction: Part I

Sara Lener,Christoph Wipplinger,Anto Abramovic,Heiko Koller,Claudius Thomé,Michael Verius,Sebastian Hartmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-06184-x

2024-07-11

Abstract:Background: Lateral mass screw fixation is the standard for posterior cervical fusion between C3 and C6. Traditional trajectories stabilize but carry risks, including nerve root and vertebral artery injuries. Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) is gaining popularity, but trajectories present anatomical challenges. Research question: This study proposes a novel pars interarticularis screw trajectory to address these issues and enhance in-line instrumentation with cervical pedicle screws. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of reformatted cervical CT scans included 10 patients. Measurements of the pars interarticularis morphology were performed on 80 segments (C3-C6). Two pars interarticularis screw trajectories were evaluated: Trajectory A (upper outer quadrant entry, horizontal trajectory) and Trajectory B (lower outer quadrant entry, cranially pointed trajectory). These were compared to standard lateral mass and cervical pedicle screw trajectories, assessing screw lengths, angles, and potential risks to the spinal canal and transverse foramen. Results: Trajectory B showed significantly longer pars lengths (15.69 ± 0.65 mm) compared to Trajectory A (12.51 ± 0.24 mm; p < 0.01). Lateral mass screw lengths were comparable to pars interarticularis screw lengths using Trajectory B. Both trajectories provided safe angular ranges, minimizing the risk to delicate structures. Discussion: and Conclusion. Pars interarticularis screws offer a viable alternative to lateral mass screws for posterior cervical fusion, especially in MISS contexts. Trajectory B, in particular, presents a feasible and safe alternative, reducing the risk of vertebral artery and spinal cord injury. Preoperative assessment and intraoperative technologies are essential for successful implementation. Biomechanical validation is needed before clinical application.
Radiographic evaluation of the technique for C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw fixation in three hundred nineteen cases.

Shenglin Wang,Chao Wang,Kirkham B Wood,Ming Yan,Haitao Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c97dc7

IF: 3.241

2011-01-01

Spine

Abstract:Study Design. Retrospective radiographic study of the technique for C1 lateral mass screw (C1LMS) and C2 pedicle screw (C2PS) fixation. Objective. To evaluate (1) the accuracy of the C1LMS and C2PS placement; (2) the fusion rate between C1 and C2; (3) the risk for vertebral artery (VA) injury. Summary of Background Data. C1LMS and C2PS fixation is widely used when treating atlantoaxial instability. Several authors have reported their experience focusing on the technical outcomes, with many reporting fusion rates near 100%. However, most of them are relatively small series, and many have applied only plain postoperative radiographs instead of computed tomography (CT). Thus, we feel that the accuracy of C1LMS and C2PS placement has not been fully analyzed, as well as the anatomic relationship between the VA and the screws. Methods. Between December 2000 and September 2008, the fusion status and accuracy of the screws were evaluated on the postoperative reconstructive CT of 319 patients with atlantoaxial instability. Cases with malpositioned screws underwent CT angiography or magnetic resonance angiography after surgery, to evaluate potential VA injury. Results. C1LMS of 95.5% and C2PS of 92.8% were found to be in a "good" position. After 2007, six cases had malpositioned screws, which were all in the "out" or "down" area of the C2 pedicle. Five cases underwent CT angiography and 1 had magnetic resonance angiography to evaluate potential VA injury. No occlusion, associated aneurysm or fistula of the VA was found. All cases (100%) achieved solid fusion between C1 and C2. Conclusion. C1LMS of 95.5% and C2PS of 92.8% were confirmed to be in good position. None of the screws including the malpositioned caused VA injury, clinically or radiographically. The technique for C1LMS and C2PS fixation appears to be safe and effective.
Interspinous-Interbody Fusion via a Strictly Lateral Surgical Approach: A Biomechanical Stabilization Comparison to Constructs Requiring Both Lateral and Posterior Approaches

Thomas P Hedman,Donna D Ohnmeiss,Jeremi Leasure,Oluwatodimu R Raji,Stephen H Hochschuler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41918

2023-07-15

Cureus

Abstract:Objective Lumbar fusion performed through lateral approaches is becoming more common. The interbody devices are generally supported by supplemental posterior fixation implanted through a posterior approach, potentially requiring a second incision and intraoperative repositioning of the patient. A minimally invasive lateral interspinous fixation device may eliminate the need for intraoperative repositioning and avoid disruption of the supraspinous ligament. The objective of this in vitrobiomechanical study was to investigate segmental multidirectional stability and maintenance of foraminal distraction of a lateral interspinous fixation device compared to commonly used pedicle screw and facet screw posterior fixation constructs when combined with lumbar interbody cages. Methods Six human cadaver lumbar spine specimens were subjected to nondestructive quasistatic loading in the following states: (1) intact; (2) interspinous fixation device alone and (3) with lateral interbody cage; (4) lateral lumbar interbody cage with bilateral pedicle screws; (5) lateral lumbar interbody cage with unilateral pedicle screws; and (6) lateral lumbar interbody cage with facet screws. Multidirectional pure bending in 1.5 Nm increments to 7.5 Nm, and 7.5 Nm flexion-extension bending with a 700 N compressive follower load were performed separately with optoelectronic segmental motion measurement. Relative angular motions of L2-L3, L3-L4, and L4-L5 functional spinal units were evaluated, and the mean instantaneous axis of rotation in the sagittal plane was calculated for the index level. Foraminal height was assessed during combined flexion-extension and compression loading for each test construct. Results All implant configurations significantly restricted flexion-extension motion compared with intact (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in flexion-extension when comparing the different posterior implants combined with lateral lumbar interbody cages. All posterior fixation devices provided comparable neuroforaminal distraction and maintained distraction during flexion and extension. Conclusions When combinedwith lateral lumbar interbody cages, the minimally invasive lateral interspinous fixation device effectively stabilized the spine and maintained neuroforaminal distraction comparable to pedicle screw constructs or facet screws. These results suggest the lateral interspinous fixation device may provide a favorable alternative to other posterior systems that require patient repositioning during surgery and involve a greater disruption of native tissues.
The Clinical Study of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous New Special C2 Transpedicular Lag-Screw Fixation for Treatment of Hangman's Fracture

Yijie Liu,Jie Chen,Weimin Jiang,Huaqing Guan,Xuefeng Li,Heng Wang,Genlin Wang,Huilin Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2018.04.007

2018-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of minimally invasive percutaneous new C2 transpedicular lag-screw fixation for management of Hangman's fractures. Methods From October 2015 to June 2017, 25 patients who had Hangman's fracture were operated with minimally invasive percutaneous new C2 transpedicular lag-screw fixation assisted by infrared navigation, among them there were 18 male and 7 female, aged from 28 to 70 years [average (46.1±13.3) years]. According to the Levine-Edwards classification: 16 patients were TypeⅠ, 6 patients were TypeⅡ and 3 patients were TypeⅡA. The cause of the injury was road traffic accident in 20 patients and fall from height in 5 patients. 19 patients were simple Hangman's fracture and other associated lesions included odontoid fracture of TypeⅡ(2 patients), atlas fracture of TypeⅠ (2 patients), rupture of spleen (1 patient), and rib fractures (1 patient). According to American Association for spinal cord injury, graded as spinal cord injury D in 3 cases and E in 22 cases. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) scores and related indicators, such as operation time, the range of motion (ROM) of cervical spine and ratio of bony union were recorded. The pre- and post- operative VAS scores of neck pain were compared with repeated measures analysis of variance. Results The mean follow-up time was (12.5±6.0) months, ranging from 3 to 24 months. Satisfactory reduction was obtained in all cases (minimal translation ≤ 2 mm without obvious C2,3 angulation). The average operation time was (65.9±12.1) min. At first day, one month, three months and the last follow-up, VAS scores of neck pain decreased comparing with preoperational measurements. There was significant difference between the pre-and post- operative VAS scores of neck pain (t=24.7, 25.8, 23.1, 24.1, P<0.001). According to American Association for spinal cord injury, three cases restored from D to E. There was no spinal cord or vertebral artery injury during operation and there was no screw loosing or breakage and cervical malformation happened during follow-up period. Bony fusion was achieved in all of these cases and the range of neck rotation was stored normal at the last follow-up. The average time of Bony fusion was (3.4±0.8) months. Conclusion The primary clinical efficacies of minimally invasive percutaneous new C2 transpedicular lag-screw fixation for treatment of Hangman's fracture were satisfactory, which carries precision and safety, immediate stability and more reliable. So it could be considered as a new choice for management of Hangman's fractures. Key words: Axis; Spinal fractures; Fracture fixation, internal; Bone screws; Surgical procedures, minimally invasive

[Results and prospects of computers in psychiatry].

Intelligent Processing

Progression of Research of Posterior Screw Fixation on Atlas

[The Use of Lateral Mass Screws and Pedicle Screws for the Treatment of Injury of Lower Cervical Spine].

Decompressive cervical laminectomy and lateral mass screw-rod arthrodesis. Surgical analysis and outcome

Evaluating laminar and lateral mass screw techniques in cervical injury management: A case series

Biomechanical Differences Between Transfacet and Lateral Mass Screw-Rod Constructs for Multilevel Posterior Cervical Spine Stabilization

Biomechanical Evaluation of Transfacet Screw Fixation for Stabilization of Multilevel Cervical Corpectomies

Lower Cervical Spine Injury Treated with Lateral Mass Plates and Pedicle Screws Through Posterior Approach.

Single use of transarticular screws in atlantoaxial instability

Management of hangman’s fracture with percutaneous transpedicular screw fixation

Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive posterior cervical fusion: a single center, single surgeon retrospective review

Minimally Invasive Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adjacent Segment Disease after Posterior Lumbar Fusion

Posterior Cervical Pedicle Screw-Rod/plate Instrumentation Combined with Unilateral Open-Door Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Compression Injury: Report of Five Cases

Spinous Process Screw Fixation: A Salvage Technique in Subaxial Cervical Spinal Instrumentation

Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy: a biomechanical study

Pars interarticularis screws for posterior cervical fusion - investigating a new trajectory using a CT-based multiplanar reconstruction: Part I

Radiographic evaluation of the technique for C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw fixation in three hundred nineteen cases.

Interspinous-Interbody Fusion via a Strictly Lateral Surgical Approach: A Biomechanical Stabilization Comparison to Constructs Requiring Both Lateral and Posterior Approaches

The Clinical Study of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous New Special C2 Transpedicular Lag-Screw Fixation for Treatment of Hangman's Fracture