An ultra-low emission coal power fleet for cleaner but not hotter air
Yana Jin,Wei Peng,Johannes Urpelainen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab99fe
IF: 6.7
2020-08-21
Environmental Research Letters
Abstract:Concerns about climate change have provoked global backlash against coal-fired power generation, which remains the backbone of major power systems in China, India, and elsewhere. Air pollution has galvanized opposition to coal-fired power generation, but counting on concerns over air pollution to promote the coal-to-renewables shift in the long run is a risky bet. As the Chinese experience shows, the best available technologies now enable coal-fired power plants to stop producing air pollution. By investing in an ultra-low emission (ULE) coal fleet, emerging countries can solve the air pollution problem in an affordable manner.Recognizing this reality, we call for an updated view regarding the role of coal power in emerging countries and in the global effort to avoid climate disruption. The prospect of a ULE coal fleet is a major <em>short-term</em> opportunity for emerging countries around the world. With the best available technology, virtually removing air pollution from coal-fired power generation brings substantial health benefits.This approach need not compromise long-term decarbonization. Emerging countries can rely on ULE to solve their air pollution problem now and then prepare for a low-carbon future by making coal-fired power plants more flexible suppliers of electricity when intermittent renewables fail to do so. As technological progress continues to address the intermittency problem and policymakers develop tools to encourage flexible generation, reducing reliance on coal-fired power generation will likely become easier and less expensive.The best available pollution control technology for coal-fired power plants is ULE technology. ULE-retrofitted coal units emit SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>x</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> at levels below 35, 50 and 10 mg/Nm<sup>3</sup> (on base of dry flue gas, 6% O<sub>2</sub>), comparable to natural gas units. Three groups of mature technologies form the basis of ULE: low-NOx burners (LNBs) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) for NO<sub>x</sub>, electrostatic precipitator (ESP) or fabric filter (FF) for PM, and flue gas desulfurization (FGD) for SO<sub>2</sub> (Romero and Wang <a class="cite" href="#erlab99febib13">2019</a>). The operation of ULE technologies needs electricity and thus increases CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, but this effect is relatively small, as the average coal consumption rate for power supply is increased by only 0.81% (or 2.51 g kWh<sup>−1</sup>). When combining efficiency-improving adjustments with the ULE facilities, the ratio drops to 0.53% (Wei <em>et al</em> <a class="cite" href="#erlab99febib16">2017</a>). ULE coal power is both technically feasible and economically affordable in emerging countries.China has already made rapid progress in reducing air pollution from its coal fleet. In 2015, the Chinese government mandated that the deployment of ULE facilities be finished by 2020. By May 2019, more than 800 GW (or 80%) of the national coal fleet had been converted to ULE units. In 2017, China's national ULE retrofit cost was 0.07–0.37 US cents kWh<sup>−1</sup>. The on-grid tariff for electricity generated by ULE units increased, but still remains one-third lower than that of gas fired units<sup class="fnref"><a class="fnref" href="#erlab99fefn5">5</a></sup>.Over the past decade China's national emission standards for SO<sub>2</sub>, PM and NO<sub>x</sub> from coal power plants were tightened twice, by two orders of magnitude (figure <a href="#erlab99fef1">1</a>). By operating the ULE retrofit equipment, the most stringent standards can be achieved. This is shown in 2014–2017 data from a continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) network covering almost all the power capacity in China (Tang <em>et al</em> <a class="cite" href="#erlab99febib15">2019</a>). Despite concerns regarding the credibility and accuracy of CEMS data, substantial pollution reductions have been validated using other methods as well (Karplus <em>et al</em> <a class="cite" href="#erlab99febib9">2018</a>).<strong>Figure 1.</strong> The pathway of a 2 °C-consistent global coal-fired power generation fleet. The graphic shows how the global coal-fired power generation fleet needs to evolve over time to first reduce air pollution and then mitigate climate change. From left to right, the columns indicate increasingly advanced technology. The rows summarize implications for air quality and health, climate mitigation, and cost of power generation. In air quality and health benefits, indoor health benefits follow 20 years later because the risk of chronic disease has a delay of onset Tall stack: emissions from tall flue gas stacks of coal-fired power plants Household stoves: emissions from cooking-and-heating stoves as an ambient air pollution source Mobile: emissions from vehicles and non-road mobile sources CCS: carbon capture and storage O&M: operations and maintenance cost Short-lived climate pollutants: black ca <p>-Abstract Truncated-</p>
environmental sciences,meteorology & atmospheric sciences