Abstract:Objective: The picosecond 755 nm alexandrite laser using a diffractive lens array has demonstrated consistent clinical efficacy for improving the appearance of acne scarring and wrinkles amongst other benefits. This small pilot study is to assess the difference, if any, in clinical benefit if a higher than the standard protocol for number of pulses delivered to a tissue area is used compared to the standard protocol guidelines. Method: Seven subjects received treatment to one side of the face with a standard protocol number of laser pulses with the other side of the face receiving higher than standard number of pulses from the same 755 nm picosecond laser using an additional diffractive lens array. Photographs at final follow up were compared to baseline by two blinded Board Certified Dermatologists and assessed for improvements to acne scarring using a 6-point grading score, for wrinkles using the Fitzpatrick Wrinkle & Elastosis 3-point grading scale and a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale assessment. Subjects also completed a satisfaction questionnaire. Results: For the acne scarring subjects, the average improvement from baseline to final follow up was 4.0 +/- 1.0 for the standard treated side and 4.5 +/- 0.5 for the high pulse side. There was no statistically significant difference between the two treated sides (P > 0.05, n = 3 paired t-test). For the wrinkle subjects, the average grading of the standard pulse side improved from 2.0 +/- 0.82 to 1.75 +/- 1.0 from baseline to final follow-up. The high pulse side improved from 1.5 +/- 1.0 to 1.125 +/- 0.25 from baseline to final follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference between the improvement of the standard and high pulse treatment sides (P > 0.05, n = 4 paired t-test). The comparison of baseline to final follow-up images of each subject found both sides to be Much or Very Much improved with no statistically significant difference between the standard and high pulse sides (P > 0.05, n = 7 paired t-test). Six of the seven subjects did not note any difference between the effect on different sides of the face and four of the seven rated their overall improvement after treatment as Good, three subjects as Reasonable and one subject with Slight Improvement. All subjects found the treatment comfortable and easy to tolerate and there was no increased incidence of side effects other than the mild occurrences typically observed for this type of treatment. Conclusion: This is a small pilot study with limited subject numbers and further data is needed to be able to make firm conclusions of observed trends, which suggest that the use of higher than standard suggested protocol number of pulses with the diffractive lens array and the 755 nm picosecond laser does not appear to offer any additional benefit over that that can already be achieved with the standard number of pulses, but also does not increase risk of detrimental post treatment effects either. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:51-55, 2018. © 2017 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Selective nonablative treatment of acne scarring with 585 nm flashlamp pulsed dye laser

755-nm Picosecond Laser With Diffractive Lens Array for Acne Scars in Fitzpatrick Skin Types V and VI

Treatment of acne scarring with a novel dual-wavelength laser

The 2910‐nm Fiber Laser Is Safe and Effective for Improving Acne Scarring

Comparison of fractionated frequency-doubled 1,064/532 nm picosecond Nd:YAG lasers and non-ablative fractional 1,540 nm Er: glass in the treatment of facial atrophic scars: a randomized, split-face, double-blind trial

Patient satisfaction and reported long-term therapeutic efficacy associated with 1,320 nm Nd:YAG laser treatment of acne scarring and photoaging

Treatment of erythematous acne scars using 595‐nm pulsed dye laser combined with 1565‐nm ResurFX nonablative fractional laser

Treatment of Post-acne Scarring with Long-pulsed and Q-switched 1,064nm Nd:YAG Laser

Using normal and high pulse coverage with picosecond laser treatment of wrinkles and acne scarring: Long term clinical observations

Treatment of inflammatory facial acne vulgaris with combination 595-nm pulsed-dye laser with dynamic-cooling-device and 1,450-nm diode laser

The Efficacy and Safety of Fractional 1064 nm Nd:YAG Picosecond Laser Combined With Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scar: A Split-Face Study

Resurfacing of Facial Acne Scars With a New Variable-Pulsed Er:YAG Laser in Fitzpatrick Skin Types IV and V

Resurfacing of atrophic facial acne scars with a multimodality CO2 and 1570 nm laser system

Comparison of a 585-nm pulsed dye laser and a 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of acne scars: A randomized split-face clinical study

Efficacy and Safety of Treatment with Fractional 1,064-nm Picosecond Laser with Diffractive Optic Element for Wrinkles and Acne Scars: A Clinical Study

[Application of Fractional Laser Resurfacing in the Treatment of Superficial Scar].

Role of the 585-nm pulsed dye laser in the treatment of acne in comparison with other topical therapeutic modalities

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of a Picosecond Alexandrite Laser With DLA for Acne Scars in Chinese Patients

Quasi long-pulsed 1064nm Nd:YAG (micro pulsed) technology for the treatment of active acne: A case series

[Pulsed dye laser treatment of acne. Study of clinical efficacy and mechanism of action]

A Single Center, Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Topical Tripeptide/Hexapeptide Anhydrous Gel When Used Pre- and Post- Hybrid Fractional Laser for the Treatment of Acne Scars