Pediatric hemolysis in emergency departments: Prevalence, risk factors, and clinical implications

Nicholas Mielke,Ray Lee,Amit Bahl

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299692

IF: 3.7

2024-03-21

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Objective This study aimed to analyze the prevalence, risk factors, and clinical implications of hemolyzed laboratory samples in the pediatric emergency department (ED), a subject on which existing data remains scarce. Methods We conducted a multi-site observational cohort analysis of pediatric ED encounters in Metro Detroit, Michigan, United States. The study included participants below 18 years of age who had undergone peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) placement and laboratory testing. The primary outcome was the presence of hemolysis, and secondary outcomes included identifying risk factors for hemolysis and assessing the impact of hemolysis on PIVC failure. Results Between January 2021 and May 2022, 10,462 ED encounters met inclusion criteria, of which 14.0% showed laboratory evidence of hemolysis. The highest proportion of hemolysis occurred in the infant (age 0–1) population (20.1%). Multivariable regression analysis indicated higher odds of hemolysis for PIVCs placed in the hand/wrist in the toddler (age 2–5) and child (age 6–11) subgroups. PIVCs placed in the hand/wrist also demonstrated higher odds of failure in infants. Conclusions Hemolysis in the pediatric ED population is a frequent complication that occurs at similar rates as in adults. PIVCs placed in the hand/wrist were associated with higher odds of hemolysis compared to those placed in the antecubital fossa. Clinicians should consider alternative locations for PIVC placement if clinically appropriate. Further research is needed to better understand the clinical implications of pediatric hemolysis.

multidisciplinary sciences