Abstract:To the Editor: Acinetobacter baumannii is a major cause of nosocomial infections associated with high morbidity and mortality, primarily in immunocompromised patients in Intensive Care Units. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug resistant (XDR) A. baumannii had become a serious widespread threat to nosocomial infections.[1] There are limited effective antimicrobial agents against these strains. Moreover, the mortality rate of A. baumannii infections was associated with inappropriate antimicrobial treatment.[12] It is critical to use effective antimicrobials for treating these A. baumannii infections. Meanwhile, discovering new antimicrobials and useful combinations of approved drugs against these strains is urgent. Thus, in this study, we discussed the in vitro activity of different antibacterial agents, including imipenem (IMI), meropenem (MEM), amikacin (AMK), ciprofloxacin (CIP), cefoperazone/sulbactam (CPS), and sulbactam (SUL) in combination with each other against MDR A. baumannii isolated from different provinces of China. Nonduplicate A. baumannii strains were collected from hospitals in different provinces of China. All strains had been identified using microbial identification system. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) had been determined by the agar dilution method as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocol. We considered a strain as MDR if it was resistant to two or more antibiotic classes.[1] Moreover, we strictly selected 116 MDR A. baumannii strains, which were all resistant to MEM, IMI, AMK, and CIP based on the MICs surveillance results, to evaluate the in vitro activities of combinations agents using agar checkerboard dilution method.[3] The combination test involved six clinically, commonly used agents, including imipenem (Merck, USA), meropenem (DSM Pharm., Suzhou, China), amikacin (Xudong Haipu, Shanghai, China), ciprofloxacin (Shangyu Xinyao, Zhejiang, China), cefoperazone/sulbactam (Pfizer, USA), and sulbactam (NICPBP, Beijing, China). The dose of each agents ranges from 1/32 MIC to 4 MIC. Freshly prepared cation-supplemented Mueller-Hinton agar and Mueller-Hinton Broth (Oxoid, Thermo Fisher, British) were used for this study. Results were interpreted by the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI).[3] The FICI was calculated for each combination using the following formula: FICI = FICA + FICB, where FICA = MIC of drug A in combination/MIC of drug A alone, and FICB = MIC of drug B in combination/MIC of drug B alone. The FICI was interpreted as follows: synergy, FICI ≤0.5; indifference, 0.5 4.0. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as internal quality control strains. The in vitro antibacterial activities of each combination are compared in Table 1. In the synergy studies, the combination of carbapenem (IMI or MEM) with amikacin (AMK) exhibited the best activity, which showed synergistic against about 50% of tested strains. And the following were SUL plus AMK and SUL plus carbapenem (IMI and MEM). The only antagonism effect happened in the combination between AMK and CIP. We found that antimicrobial agents in combination with AMK would have relative higher synergy response while the combination with CIP primarily produces indifferent response.Table 1: The percentage of the FICI of the six antimicrobial agents combination with each other against 116 MDR Acinetobacter baumanniiThe ideal therapy approach to microbial infections should be based on the evaluation of individual isolate susceptibility pattern. Considering carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii strains were usually resistant to all classes of antimicrobials other than tigecycline and colistin, the overall treatment strategy generally depended on the susceptibility of carbapenems. For those carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, colistin, tigecycline, and rifampicin may be the alternatives; however, these agents were generally considered as the last choice for MDR A. baumannii and they also had obvious limits as described previous.[12] The combination of different antimicrobial agents was another strategy to overcome these MDR A. baumannii. On the one hand, combination of agents with different antimicrobial mechanisms may exert an enhanced pharmacodynamic effect, namely synergism. On the other hand, to a certain extent, combination treatment would prevent emergence of resistance.[4] Our study found that AMK in combination with carbapenems (IMI and MEM) would produce relative higher synergy response, the following combination were SUL plus AMK and SUL plus carbapenems. The previous survey had shown that combinations of IMI or MEM with SUL or ampicillin/sulbactam were potential choice for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant strains. At present, clinical data about combination therapy was relative less.[5] The ideal therapy approach to infections should be initially based on the evaluation of in vitro susceptibility surveillance. In this study, we provided valuable in vitro data for clinicians’ strategy against MDR A. baumannii infections through studying the synergy effect of six commonly used agents on large-scale samples, which partly represent the characteristics of China strains. Further studies to investigate in vivo effect for its clinical significance are needed. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

A combination regimen of meropenem, cefoperazone‐sulbactam and minocycline for extensive burns with pan‐drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infection

A case of treatment for pulmonary infection caused by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

[Clinical characteristics and therapy of pan-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infection].

National Epidemiology of Carbapenem-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Gram-negative Bacteria Isolated from Blood Samples in China in 2013.

Pathogen Distribution and Drug Resistance in A Burn Ward: A Three-Year Retrospective Analysis of A Single Center in China

Combinations of Antibiotics Effective against Extensively- and Pandrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Patient Isolates

Risk Factors for Acquisition and Mortality of Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii Bacteremia

A Multicenter Clinical Trial of Piperacillin/tazobactam in Burn Infection

Polymyxin-resistant, Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii is Eradicated by a Triple Combination of Agents That Lack Individual Activity

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Multi-drug Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Isolates from 27 Hospitals in China

Exploring Synergistic Combinations in Extended and Pan-Drug Resistant (XDR and PDR) Whole Genome Sequenced Acinetobacter baumannii

Treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Optimizing Treatment Strategies for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii-Associated Pneumonia: A Multicenter Study in Chinese Hospitals

Study of genetic diversity, biofilm formation, and detection of Carbapenemase, MBL, ESBL, and tetracycline resistance genes in multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from burn wound infections in Iran

Risk and Prognostic Factors for Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii Complex Bacteremia: A Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Hospital of West China

Antimicorbial treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia

Intrahospital Dissemination of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii and Analysis of the Infected Patients' Prognosis.

In Vitro Activity of Different Antibacterial Agents in Combination with Each Other Against Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii

Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Intravenous Polymyxin B-based Treatment in Critically Ill Patients with Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Nosocomial Pneumonia.

An outbreak with multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii on a burn ICU and its control with multifaceted containment measures

Inside-out, antimicrobial resistance mediated by efflux pumps in clinical strains of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from burn wound infections