GADT meet Subtyping

Gabriel Scherer,Didier Rémy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1210.5935
2012-10-22
Abstract:While generalized abstract datatypes (GADT) are now considered well-understood, adding them to a language with a notion of subtyping comes with a few surprises. What does it mean for a GADT parameter to be covariant? The answer turns out to be quite subtle. It involves fine-grained properties of the subtyping relation that raise interesting design questions. We allow variance annotations in GADT definitions, study their soundness, and present a sound and complete algorithm to check them. Our work may be applied to real-world ML-like languages with explicit subtyping such as OCaml, or to languages with general subtyping constraints.
Programming Languages
What problem does this paper attempt to address?