Sebastian Grauwin,Guillaume Beslon,Eric Fleury,Sara Franceschelli,Céline Robardet,Jean-Baptiste Rouquier,Pablo Jensen
Abstract:Using a large database (~ 215 000 records) of relevant articles, we empirically study the "complex systems" field and its claims to find universal principles applying to systems in general. The study of references shared by the papers allows us to obtain a global point of view on the structure of this highly interdisciplinary field. We show that its overall coherence does not arise from a universal theory but instead from computational techniques and fruitful adaptations of the idea of self-organization to specific systems. We also find that communication between different disciplines goes through specific "trading zones", ie sub-communities that create an interface around specific tools (a DNA microchip) or concepts (a network).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to explore whether the field of complex systems science has found universal principles that can be generally applied to various systems. Specifically, researchers use relevant articles in a large - scale database (about 215,000 records) and analyze the references shared by these articles to obtain a global perspective on the overall structure of this highly interdisciplinary field. The main research questions include:
1. **Does the overall consistency of complex systems science originate from a universal theory?**
- The study found that the overall consistency of complex systems science does not come from a universal theory, but from the successful application of computing techniques and the concept of self - organization in specific systems.
2. **How does communication between different disciplines occur?**
- The study found that communication between different disciplines is mainly achieved through specific "trading zones". These "trading zones" refer to small communities formed around specific tools (such as DNA chips) or concepts (such as networks).
### Main Findings
- **Overall Consistency**:
- The overall consistency of complex systems science is not driven by a universal theory, but by the successful application of computing techniques and the concept of self - organization. For example, self - organization is not a predictive theory, but a method that focuses on the spontaneous generation of large - scale structures from local interactions of system subunits.
- **Trading Zones**:
- Communication between different disciplines is achieved through specific "trading zones". These "trading zones" are usually formed around specific technologies or concepts, enabling scientists from different disciplines to cooperate under a simplified common language. For example, transcriptomics data analysis, as a "trading zone", connects biology and computer science, allowing biologists to use data mining techniques to interpret the large amount of data generated by DNA chips.
### Conclusions
- **Characteristics of Complex Systems Science**:
- The overall consistency of complex systems science mainly comes from the application of computing techniques and the concept of self - organization, rather than a unified theoretical framework.
- Through "trading zones", scientists from different disciplines can find common ground on specific technologies or concepts, thus promoting interdisciplinary cooperation.
- **Questioning of Universal Principles**:
- Although the field of complex systems science has proposed the dream of finding universal principles, current research results show that such universal principles have not yet been discovered. Instead, the progress in this field depends more on the application of specific computing techniques and the concept of self - organization in specific systems.
In conclusion, through empirical research in the field of complex systems science, this paper reveals the internal structure of this field and the mechanism of interdisciplinary communication, challenging the traditional view on the existence of universal principles.