Abstract:Independent sociological polls are forbidden in Belarus. Online polls performed without sound scientific rigour do not yield representative results. Yet, both inside and outside Belarus it is of great importance to obtain precise estimates of the ratings of all candidates. These ratings could function as reliable proxies for the election's outcomes. We conduct an independent poll based on the combination of the data collected via Viber and on the streets of Belarus. The Viber and the street data samples consist of almost 45000 and 1150 unique observations respectively. Bayesian regressions with poststratification were build to estimate ratings of the candidates and rates of early voting turnout for the population as a whole and within various focus subgroups. We show that both the officially announced results of the election and early voting rates are highly improbable. With a probability of at least 95%, Sviatlana Tikhanouskaya's rating lies between 75% and 80%, whereas Aliaksandr Lukashenka's rating lies between 13% and 18% and early voting rate predicted by the method ranges from 9% to 13% of those who took part in the election. These results contradict the officially announced outcomes, which are 10.12%, 80.11%, and 49.54% respectively and lie far outside even the 99.9% credible intervals predicted by our model. The only marginal groups of people where the upper bounds of the 99.9% credible intervals of the rating of Lukashenka are above 50% are people older than 60 and uneducated people. For all other marginal subgroups, including rural residents, even the upper bounds of 99.9% credible intervals for Lukashenka are far below 50%. The same is true for the population as a whole. Thus, with a probability of at least 99.9% Lukashenka could not have had enough electoral support to win the 2020 presidential election in Belarus.

Statistical anomalies in 2011-2012 Russian elections revealed by 2D correlation analysis

Election forensic analysis of the Turkish Constitutional Referendum 2017

Elections in Russia, 1991-2008

Forensic analysis of the Turkey 2023 presidential election reveals extreme vote swings in remote areas

Testing for voter rigging in small polling stations

Statistical and Mathematical Evidence of Rigged Parliamentary Elections in Georgia, 2024

United Russia’s Primaries and the Strength of Political Machines in the Regions of Russia: Evidence from the 2016 Duma Elections

Multilevel regression with poststratification for the national level Viber/Street poll on the 2020 presidential election in Belarus

Universal Statistics of Competition in Democratic Elections

Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior

A belief systems analysis of fraud beliefs following the 2020 US election

On the reliability of voting processes: the Mexican case

Entropic Spatial Auto-correlation of Voter Uncertainty and Voter Transitions in Parliamentary Elections

Universality in voting behavior: an empirical analysis

Novelty Detection for Election Fraud: A Case Study with Agent-Based Simulation Data

Bipartisanship breakdown, functional networks and forensic analysis in Spanish 2015 and 2016 national elections

2004 Venezuelan Presidential Recall Referendum (2004 PRR): A Statistical Analysis from the Point of View of Electronic Voting Data Transmissions

NIZHNY NOVGOROD MAYORAL ELECTIONS IN 1998 AND 2002: LESSONS OF DEMOCRATIC FORMATION OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT BODIES

Election Forensics: quantitative methods for electoral fraud detection

An analysis of New South Wales electronic vote counting

Une étude de physique sur les élections