P523 The performance indicator of colonic intubation (PICI) in an Irish Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) cohort
F Jones,A Lavelle,F McCarthy,S Patchett,A Morcos,M Moloney,G Cullen,E Slattery,J Leyden,C O' Morain,L Egan,G A Doherty
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0653
2024-01-01
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Abstract:Abstract Background Comprehensive assessment of endoscopic disease activity and mucosal healing is central to therapeutic decision making in IBD. Data suggests that IBD patients may have a poorer experience of endoscopy with a higher burden associated with bowel preparation, higher GI specific anxiety and increased procedure related pain. Existing KPIs may be inadequate in capturing appropriate patient outcomes in IBD patients. PICI is a novel composite endpoint incorporating patient safety and comfort to ensure targets are met without compromising patient safety. Methods The aims of this study were to assess the safety, tolerability, and feasibility of colonoscopy in patients with IBD compared to non-IBD patients in Ireland using PICI, defined as successful caecal intubation with nurse assisted comfort score ≤3 and midazolam dose ≤2. We reviewed de-identified national endoscopy procedure data on all colonoscopies performed over a 6 year period in 24 hospitals nationally using the EndoRAAD reporting system. Procedures were categorised into IBD and non-IBD procedures on the basis or procedure indication (IBD surveillance or assessment) or a new diagnosis of IBD. Results Procedure data from 261,889 colonoscopies from 2014-2020 were analyzed (IBD: n=18,675; non-IBD: n=243,214 procedures). The Odds Ratio (OR) of achieving PICI was significantly lower in IBD patients compared to non-IBD patients, particularly in patients with Crohn’s Disease (0.74, 0.68-0.81, p<0.001). Male gender was associated with a significantly higher OR of achieving PICI (1.32 (1.29-1.35, p<0.001). Poor bowel prep was associated with reduced PICI (OR 0.78, p<0.001). Additionally, procedures performed by supervised trainees had significantly reduced PICI (OR 0.69, p=0.032). The extent of colonic inflammation had no significant impact on PICI in IBD patients (OR moderate and severe inflammation 1.08 (p=0.66); and 1.06 (p=0.79) respectively). Mean procedure time was slightly longer for IBD patients (28.7 min versus 26.7 min, p<0.001), with 91.1% of IBD patients having mucosal biopsies compared to only 26.3% of non-IBD patients (p < 0.001). Conclusion This large retrospective cohort study utilises the novel composite measure of PICI to assess the safety, tolerability, and feasibility of colonoscopy in IBD patients compared to non-IBD patients. We have identified significantly poorer comfort scores and higher sedation rates required to achieve caecal intubation at colonoscopy in IBD patients, particularly in patients with Crohn’s Disease. Further exploration is required to identify factors to improve the safety and quality of endoscopy in IBD patients.
gastroenterology & hepatology