S. Narayana Jammalamadaka,S. S. Rao,S. V.Bhat,J. Vanacken,V. V. Moshchalkov
Abstract:We report on exchange bias effects in 10 nm particles of Pr0.5Ca0.5MnO3 which appear as a result of competing interactions between the ferromagnetic (FM)/anti-ferromagnetic (AFM) phases. The fascinating new observation is the demonstration of the temperature dependence of oscillatory exchange bias (OEB) and is tunable as a function of cooling field strength below the SG phase, may be attributable to the presence of charge/spin density wave (CDW/SDW) in the AFM core of PCMO10. The pronounced training effect is noticed at 5 K from the variation of the EB field as a function of number of field cycles (n) upon the field cooling (FC) process. For n > 1, power-law behavior describes the experimental data well; however, the breakdown of spin configuration model is noticed at n \geq 1.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to study the exchange bias effect (EB) and its training effect in nanocrystalline Pr\(_{0.5}\)Ca\(_{0.5}\)MnO\(_3\) (PCMO10). Specifically, the author focuses on the following aspects:
1. **Temperature - dependent oscillatory exchange bias effect**:
- The oscillatory exchange bias phenomenon of PCMO10 was studied at different temperatures, especially below the spin - glass transition temperature \(T_{SG}=40 \, \text{K}\). This oscillatory behavior may be related to charge/spin density waves (CDW/SDW).
2. **Training effect**:
- The variation law of the exchange bias field \(H_{EB}\) after multiple magnetization cycles was explored. The experimental results show that after the first magnetization cycle, \(H_{EB}\) decreases significantly, and as the number of cycles \(n\) increases, it exhibits a power - law behavior \(H_{EB}(n)=H_{EB∞}+Dn^{-α}\), where \(H_{EB∞}\) is the limit value of \(H_{EB}\), \(D\) is a constant, and \(\alpha\) is a positive exponent.
3. **Effect of cooling field intensity on exchange bias**:
- The effects of different cooling field intensities \(H_{FC}\) on the exchange bias field \(H_{EB}\) and coercivity \(H_C\) were studied. The results show that as the cooling field intensity increases, \(H_{EB}\) first increases and then decreases, while \(H_C\) gradually increases and saturates.
4. **Discussion of microscopic mechanisms**:
- A core - shell model was proposed to explain these phenomena. It is considered that the core of PCMO10 exhibits antiferromagnetism (AFM), while the shell exhibits ferromagnetism or spin - glass - like (FM/SG - like). The uncompensated magnetic moments at the interface may be one of the reasons for the exchange bias effect.
Through these studies, the author hopes to deepen the understanding of the exchange bias effect in nanoscale manganates and provide a theoretical basis for further exploring its applications in spintronic devices.
### Main formulas
The main formulas involved in the paper include:
- Power - law behavior describing the training effect:
\[
H_{EB}(n)=H_{EB∞}+Dn^{-α}
\]
where \(H_{EB∞}\) is the limit value of \(H_{EB}\), \(D\) is a constant, and \(\alpha\) is a positive exponent.
- Formula describing the change of \(H_{EB}\) with the cooling field intensity \(H_{FC}\):
\[
H_{EB}\propto J_i\left(f(L(x))+\frac{\mu}{k_BT_f}\right)
\]
where \(J_i\) is the interface exchange coupling constant, \(g\) is the gyromagnetic ratio, \(L(x)\) is the Langevin function, \(x = \frac{\mu H_{FC}}{k_BT_f}\), \(\mu_B = 9.274\times 10^{-24}\, \text{J/10 kOe}\) is the Bohr magneton, \(k_B = 1.381\times 10^{-23}\, \text{J/K}\) is the Boltzmann constant, \(\mu\) is the magnetic moment, \(H_{FC}\) is the cooling field intensity, and \(T_f = 5\, \text{K}\) is the measurement temperature.
These formulas help to explain the experimental data and provide theoretical support for understanding the exchange bias effect.