Abstract:BACKGROUND:The assignment of a point-level geocode to subjects' residences is an important data assimilation component of many geographic public health studies. Often, these assignments are made by a method known as automated geocoding, which attempts to match each subject's address to an address-ranged street segment georeferenced within a streetline database and then interpolate the position of the address along that segment. Unfortunately, this process results in positional errors. Our study sought to model the probability distribution of positional errors associated with automated geocoding and E911 geocoding.RESULTS:Positional errors were determined for 1423 rural addresses in Carroll County, Iowa as the vector difference between each 100%-matched automated geocode and its true location as determined by orthophoto and parcel information. Errors were also determined for 1449 60%-matched geocodes and 2354 E911 geocodes. Huge (> 15 km) outliers occurred among the 60%-matched geocoding errors; outliers occurred for the other two types of geocoding errors also but were much smaller. E911 geocoding was more accurate (median error length = 44 m) than 100%-matched automated geocoding (median error length = 168 m). The empirical distributions of positional errors associated with 100%-matched automated geocoding and E911 geocoding exhibited a distinctive Greek-cross shape and had many other interesting features that were not capable of being fitted adequately by a single bivariate normal or t distribution. However, mixtures of t distributions with two or three components fit the errors very well.CONCLUSION:Mixtures of bivariate t distributions with few components appear to be flexible enough to fit many positional error datasets associated with geocoding, yet parsimonious enough to be feasible for nascent applications of measurement-error methodology to spatial epidemiology.

Multiple imputation for sharing precise geographies in public use data

Multiple Imputation of Missing Categorical and Continuous Values via Bayesian Mixture Models with Local Dependence

Modeling the Probability Distribution of Positional Errors Incurred by Residential Address Geocoding.

Estimating Spatial Variation in Disease Risk from Locations Coarsened by Incomplete Geocoding

Likelihood-based Estimation of Spatial Intensity and Variation in Disease Risk from Locations Observed with Error

Multiple imputation for statistical disclosure limitation

Geographic ratemaking with spatial embeddings

A Bayesian hierarchical small-area population model accounting for data source specific methodologies from American Community Survey, Population Estimates Program, and Decennial Census data

Privacy for Spatial Point Process Data

Geospatial Imprecision With Constraints for Precision Public Health: Algorithm Development and Validation

Multiple imputation in health‐are databases: An overview and some applications

Spatial Autocorrelation among Automated Geocoding Errors and Its Effects on Testing for Disease Clustering

Synthesizing geocodes to facilitate access to detailed geographical information in large scale administrative data

Addressing Census data problems in race imputation via fully Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding and name supplements

Releasing survey microdata with exact cluster locations and additional privacy safeguards

Multiple Imputation in Health-Care Databases: an Overview and Some Applications.

Learning from the History: Accurately and Efficiently Aggregating Geospatial Data under Local Differential Privacy

Multiply-Imputed Synthetic Data: Advice to the Imputer

Leveraging Differential Privacy in Geospatial Analyses of Standardized Healthcare Data

Generating Poisson-Distributed Differentially Private Synthetic Data

Multiple imputation after 18+ years