Abstract:The dynamic behaviour of wildfires is mainly influenced by weather, fuel, and topography. Based on fundamental conservation laws involving numerous physical processes and large scales, atmospheric models require substantial computational resources. Therefore, coupling wildfire and atmospheric models is impractical for high resolutions, even for small scales. Instead, a static atmospheric wind field is typically input into the wildfire model, either as boundary conditions on the control surface or distributed throughout the control volume. Wildfire propagation models may be ( i ) data-driven ; (ii) theoretical ; or (iii) mechanistic surrogates . Data-driven models are beyond the scope of this paper. Theoretical models are based on conservation laws (species, energy, mass, momentum) and, therefore, are computationally expensive—e.g. the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS). Mechanistic surrogate models do not closely follow fire dynamics laws, but a different set of related laws observed to make predictions more efficiently and with sufficient accuracy—e.g. FARSITE, and FDS with the Level Set model (FDS-LS). Whether theoretical or mechanistic surrogate, these wildfire models may be coupled with or decoupled from wind models (e.g. Navier-Stokes equations). Only coupled models account for the effect of the fire on the wind field. In this paper, a series of simulations of wildfire propagation on grassland are performed using FDS-LS to study the impact of the fire-induced wind on the fire propagation dynamics. Results show that coupling leads to higher Rates of Spread (RoS), closer to the values reported from field experiments, with increasing wind speeds and higher terrain slopes strengthening this trend. Aiming to capture the fire–wind interaction without the hefty cost of solving Navier-Stokes equations, a conceptual framework is proposed: 1) a swarm of unmanned aerial vehicles measure wind velocities at flight height; 2) the wind field is constructed with the acquired data; 3) the high-altitude wind field is mapped to near-surface, and 4) the near-surface wind field is fed into the wildfire model periodically. A series of simulations are performed using an in-house decoupled physics-based reduced-order fire propagation model (FireProM-F) enhanced by wind field "measurements". In this proof of concept, wind velocities are not actually measured but extracted from high-fidelity physics-based Large Eddy Simulations within FDS, which are taken as ground truth. Unsurprisingly, higher measurement frequencies lead to more accurate predictions of the RoS and to more realistic formations of the propagating fire front. An initial attempt is made to study the effect of wind measurement uncertainty on the model predictions by adding Gaussian noise. Preliminary results show that higher noise leads to the fire front displaying a less smooth shape and slower propagation.

Assimilation of Perimeter Data and Coupling with Fuel Moisture in a Wildland Fire - Atmosphere DDDAS

Data assimilation of fuel moisture in WRF-SFIRE

Coupled atmosphere-wildland fire modeling with WRF-Fire

WRF fire simulation coupled with a fuel moisture model and smoke transport by WRF-Chem

Data assimilation of dead fuel moisture observations from remote automated weather stations

A wildland fire modeling and visualization environment

Real time simulation of 2007 Santa Ana fires

Ignition from a Fire Perimeter in a WRF Wildland Fire Model

Data Assimilation of Satellite Fire Detection in Coupled Atmosphere-Fire Simulation by WRF-SFIRE

An overview of the coupled atmosphere-wildland fire model WRF-Fire

Air pollution forecasting by coupled atmosphere-fire model WRF and SFIRE with WRF-Chem

Toward an integrated system for fire, smoke, and air quality simulations

WRF simulation over complex terrain during a southern California wildfire event

Combined Estimation of Fire Perimeters and Fuel Adjustment Factors in FARSITE for Forecasting Wildland Fire Propagation

Building a Fuel Moisture Model for the Coupled Fire-Atmosphere Model WRF-SFIRE from Data: From Kalman Filters to Recurrent Neural Networks

Assimilation of fire perimeters and satellite detections by minimization of the residual in a fire spread model

Modelling wildfire spread and spotfire merger using conformal mapping and AAA-least squares methods

Modeling wildfire dynamics through a physics-based approach incorporating fuel moisture and landscape heterogeneity

Experimental Design of a Prescribed Burn Instrumentation

Assimilation of Satellite Active Fires Data

Enhancing Wildfire Propagation Model Predictions Using Aerial Swarm-Based Real-Time Wind Measurements: A Conceptual Framework