Fe-doped CeTiO x catalysts facilitate the oriented oxidation of NO to achieving simultaneous desulfurization and denitration in a WFGD system
Lei Zhou,Zhixiang Wei,Junkang Fan,Qingqing Yu,Chuang Zhao,Jie Zhang,Liming Yang,Weili Dai,Linjun Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131246
IF: 7.4
2024-02-23
Fuel
Abstract:Nitric oxide (NO) is one of the main air pollutants emitted from coal-fired power plants. In recent years, the application of the selective catalytic oxidation (SCO) technique for NO removal has garnered a great deal of attention from many researchers, owing to its stronger oxidation capability, better economic. In this paper, an Fe-doped CeTiOx catalyst was synthesized by coprecipitation method, and its catalytic performance of NO oxidation was studied. Finally, based on the typical operating conditions of wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD), the influence of different absorbents and operating conditions on the synergistic absorption performance was investigated. The results showed that when the experimental temperature was 140 °C, the molar ratio (MR) of O3/NO and H2O2/NO was 0.4 and 0.8, the oxidation efficiency of NO and the oriented oxidation efficiency of NO2 could reach 95.11 % and 92.34 %, respectively. Furthermore, the structure and surface properties of the catalysts were analysed by X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM), H2 Temperature Programmed Reduction (H2-TPR) and Ultraviolet–Visible Absorbance Spectroscopy (UV–vis). The results showed that the doping of Fe on the CeTiOx catalyst led to an increase in the amount of adsorbed oxygen on the catalyst surface, which was beneficial for the generation of additional •OH groups by O3 and H2O2 and ultimately promoted the oxidation of NO in the flue gas. Moreover, (NH4)2SO3, which has a relatively high reducing ability, was adopted as an absorbent to synergistically remove NO2 and SO2 from flue gas. When the concentration of the absorbent was 10 wt%, and the liquid–gas ratio was 15 L/m3, the removal efficiencies of SO2 and NO2 reached 99.9 % and 85.35 %, respectively.
energy & fuels,engineering, chemical