Target flow deviations on the cardiopulmonary bypass cause postoperative delirium in cardiothoracic surgery—a retrospective study evaluating temporal fluctuations of perfusion data

Johannes Krefting,Hagen Gorki,Markus Hoenicka,Günter Albrecht,Robert Kraft,Andreas Liebold

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae016

2024-02-29

Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery

Abstract:Postoperative delirium (POD) is common, costly and associated with long-term morbidity and increased mortality. We conducted a cohort study to assess the contribution of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to the development of POD by means of algorithm-based data processing. A database was compiled from 3 datasets of patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 2014 and 2019: intensive care unit discharge files, CPB protocols and medical quality management records. Following data extraction and structuring using novel algorithms, missing data were imputed. Ten independent imputations were analysed by multiple logistic regression with stepwise deletion of factors to arrive at a minimal adequate model. POD was diagnosed in 456/3163 patients (14.4%). In addition to known demographic risk factors and comorbidities like male sex, age, carotid disease, acute kidney failure and diabetes mellitus, cardiopulmonary parameters like total blood volume at the CPB [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.001; confidence interval (CI) 1.1001–1.002] were independent predictors of POD. Higher values of the minimal blood flow were associated with a lower risk of POD (AOR 0.993; CI 0.988–0.997). Flow rates at least 30% above target did emerge in the minimal adequate model as a potential risk factor, but the confidence interval suggested a lack of statistical significance (AOR 1.819; 95% CI: 0.955–3.463). CPB data processing proved to be a useful tool for obtaining compact information to better identify the roles of individual operational states. Strict adherence to perfusion limits along with tighter control of blood flow and acid–base balance during CPB may help to further decrease the risk of POD.

surgery,cardiac & cardiovascular systems,respiratory system

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to explore whether deviations in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) parameters during heart surgery can lead to postoperative delirium (POD). Specifically, by retrospectively analyzing the data of patients who underwent heart surgery at the University of Ulm Medical Center between 2014 and 2019, the researchers evaluated the relationship between fluctuations in blood flow and other key parameters during CPB and the occurrence of POD. The main purpose of the study was to determine which CPB parameter deviations might increase the risk of POD and to explore how these parameters affect patients' postoperative cognitive function.

### Main research questions
1. **Is the deviation of CPB parameters related to the occurrence of postoperative delirium?**
- The researchers hypothesized that deviations in blood flow and pressure during CPB may exist immediately or persist for a certain period of time, thereby affecting the risk of POD. Similarly, changes in body temperature, blood pH value, and blood gas concentration may also be related to POD.

2. **Which specific CPB parameter deviations are independent predictors of POD?**
- By processing and analyzing CPB data through algorithms, the researchers attempted to identify which parameter deviations were significantly associated with the occurrence of POD.

### Method overview
- **Data sources**: The research data came from three data sets: intensive care unit discharge documents, CPB protocols, and medical quality management records.
- **Data processing**: A data - processing tool developed in Python was used to extract and process CPB data, classify it into predefined value ranges, and calculate various time characteristics, such as the longest continuous time and the cumulative time.
- **Statistical analysis**: Generalized linear models (GLM) were used for multivariate regression analysis to identify independent predictors of POD.

### Main findings
- **Incidence of POD**: Among 3,163 patients, 456 (14.4%) were diagnosed with POD.
- **Independent predictors**:
- For every 1 - liter increase in total CPB blood volume, the risk of POD increased by 1.001 times (adjusted odds ratio AOR 1.001; 95% confidence interval CI 1.001 - 1.002).
- The longer the time that the minimum blood flow was maintained below the target flow, the higher the risk of POD (AOR 0.993; CI 0.988 - 0.997).
- The situation where the target flow was at least 30% higher occurred in the minimum - fit model but did not reach statistical significance (AOR 1.819; 95% CI 0.955 - 3.463).

### Conclusions
- **Importance of CPB data processing**: By algorithmically processing CPB data, the role of individual operating states can be more effectively identified, which helps to better understand the impact of CPB parameters on POD.
- **Clinical recommendations**: Strictly adhering to perfusion limits and more closely controlling blood flow and acid - base balance may help to further reduce the risk of POD.

In conclusion, this study, through a detailed analysis of CPB data, has revealed the relationship between deviations in certain parameters and the occurrence of POD, providing a valuable reference for preventing POD in clinical practice.