Abstract:This study elaborates on a typology of demographic change and tests this definition at the lowest granular level (LAU2, municipality) with official data. This typology distinguishes between fragile and resilient municipalities based on population dynamics (in terms of duration and intensity) over 1991–2021. This study's second aim is to elaborate a spatial autoregressive econometric model to evaluate to what extent and in which direction the rate of participation of potential beneficiaries of the Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) of 2014–2020 is affected by demographic change and other explanatory variables. Regression models compare the results of the OLS (aspatial) and spatial autoregressive models (SAR) of four types of participation rates (all RDP schemes; all LEADER schemes; sectoral schemes of RDP and LEADER; non-sectoral schemes of RDPs and LEADER). This comparison makes it possible to understand the differences between centralised and decentralised management and between sectoral and broader rural-targeted schemes. The results of the models appear attractive in interpreting the role of RDP instruments in different regions and local areas. First, the rate of participation is strongly dependent on macro-regional differences. Regarding the demographic factors at the local level, this study highlights that demographic fragility does not necessarily hamper the use of RDP measures. Conversely, the participation rate in RDP policy schemes seems particularly significant in very fragile areas, whereas significance has yet to be proved in other demographic typologies. This result holds particularly true for the policy uptake of non-sectoral schemes. Furthermore, LEADER decentralised interventions fit the fragile areas more than resilient and vital ones due to the territorially targeted approach followed by the Local Action Groups.

What are university satellite campuses for? A perspective on their contribution to Italian municipalities and regions

The Italian University Reform under the Bologna Process

Civic universities and bottom-up approaches to boost local development of rural areas: the case of the University of Macerata

Data-based understanding and optimization of sustainability of university mobility: two case studies

A composite index of sustainable development at the local scale: Italy as a case study

Research, knowledge transfer, and innovation: The effect of Italian universities’ efficiency on local economic development 2006−2012

Unveiling spatial patterns of population in Italian municipalities

Modelling geographical variations in fertility and population density of Italian and foreign populations at the local scale: a spatial Durbin approach for Italy (2002–2018)

How to evaluate the impact of academic spin-offs on local development: an empirical analysis of the Italian case

University Technology Transfer and the Contribution of University Spin-offs in Stimulating the Socio-economic Development of Regions

Towards (spatially) unbalanced development? A joint assessment of regional disparities in socioeconomic and territorial variables in Italy

Toward sustainable cities: Assessing drivers of SDG performance in Italian municipalities

Ecosystem Services Multifunctionality: An Analytical Framework to Support Sustainable Spatial Planning in Italy

Spatial Trends of Towns in Europe: The Performance of Regions with Low Degree of Urbanisation

Firm cooperation policies: the impact of territorial spillovers

Identifying On-Site and Off-Site Drivers of Land Degradation in Advanced Economies: A Spatial Approach for Italy

Does University Quality Influence the Interregional Mobility of Students and Graduates? The Case of Italy

University spin-offs: entrepreneurship, growth and regional development

A subregional analysis of family change: The spatial diffusion of one‐parent families across Italian municipalities, 1991–2011

Computational social science in regional analysis and the European real estate market

Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Demographic Changes on Local Participation in Italian Rural Policies (2014–2020): A Spatial Autoregressive Econometric Model