Abstract:Given the significance of nitrogen (N) as the most constraining nutrient in agro-ecosystems, it is crucial to develop an updated model for N fertilizers management to achieve higher crop yields while minimizing the negative impacts on the environment. Coated urea is touted as one of the most important controlled-release N fertilizers used in agriculture to reduce cropland emissions and improve nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) for optimal crop yields. The sustainability of coated urea depends on the trade-offs between crop productivity, NUE and greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, CH4 and N2O); however, role of various agro-edaphic factors in influencing these trade-offs remains unclear. To determine the effects of soil properties, climatic conditions, experimental conditions, and type of coated urea on greenhouse gas emissions, NH3 losses, crop productivity, and NUE, we conducted a meta-analysis using data from 76 peer-reviewed studies. Our results showed that the application of coated urea under field conditions contributed to a greater reduction in N2O emissions (-48.67%) and higher NUE (58.72%), but crop yields were not significant. Across different climate regions, subtropical monsoon climate showed a perceptible mitigation for CO2, CH4 and NH3 (-78.38%; -83.33%; -27.46%), while temperate climate reduced N2O emissions by -70.36%. For different crops, only rice demonstrated reduction in CO2, CH4, N2O and NH3 losses. On the other hand, our findings revealed a mitigating trade-off between CO2 and CH4 emissions on medium-textured soils and N2O emissions on fine-textured soils. A significant reduction in N2O and NH3 losses was evident when coated urea was applied to soils with a pH > 5.5. Interestingly, application of coated urea to soils with higher C/N ratios increased NH3 losses but showed a noticeable N2O reduction. We found that polymer-coated urea reduced CH4 and N2O emissions and NH3 losses at the expense of higher CO2 emissions. Moreover, application of a lower dose of coated urea (0-100 kg N ha-1) enhanced CO2 and CH4 mitigation, while N2O mitigation increased linearly with increasing dose of coated urea. Most importantly, our results showed that the application of coated urea leads to a large mismatch between NUE, crop yields and greenhouse gas mitigation. By and large, the application of coated urea did not correspond with higher crop yields despite significant reduction in the emissions and improved NUE. Overall, these results suggest that site-specific agro-edaphic conditions should be considered when applying coated urea to reduce these emissions and N volatilization losses for increasing NUE and crop yields.

Coated controlled-release urea creates a win-win scenario for producing more staple grains and resolving N loss dilemma worldwide

Application of controlled release urea improved grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency: A meta-analysis

Can controlled-release urea replace the split application of normal urea in China? A meta-analysis based on crop grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency

Controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer application mitigated N losses and modified microbial community while improving wheat yield and N use efficiency

Controlled release urea improves rice production and reduces environmental pollution: a research based on meta-analysis and machine learning

Application of Controlled-Release Urea in Rice: Reducing Environmental Risk While Increasing Grain Yield and Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency

Can urea-coated fertilizers be an effective means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving crop productivity?

Mixed application of controlled-release urea and normal urea can improve crop productivity and reduce the carbon footprint under straw return in winter wheat-summer maize cropping system

Impact of controlled-release urea on rice yield, nitrogen use efficiency and soil fertility in a single rice cropping system

Reducing nitrogen losses through ammonia volatilization and surface runoff to improve apparent nitrogen recovery of double cropping of late rice using controlled release urea

Effects of Fertilization on Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Wheat and Rice with Straw Return

Split application of polymer-coated urea combined with common urea improved nitrogen efficiency without sacrificing wheat yield and benefits while saving 20% nitrogen input

Impact of fertilization schemes with different ratios of urea to controlled release nitrogen fertilizer on environmental sustainability, nitrogen use efficiency and economic benefit of rice production: A study case from Southwest China

Can the Blended Application of Controlled-Release and Common Urea Effectively Replace the Common Urea in a Wheat-Maize Rotation System? A Case Study Based on a Long-Term Experiment

Subsurface Banding of Blended Controlled-Release Urea Can Optimize Rice Yields While Minimizing Yield-Scaled Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Application of Controlled-Release Urea Enhances Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Irrigated Rice in the Yangtze River Basin, China

Controlled Release Urea Improved Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Activities of Leaf Enzymes, and Rice Yield

Straw returning and one-time application of a mixture of controlled release and solid granular urea to reduce carbon footprint of plastic film mulching spring maize

Controlled-release urea application and optimized nitrogen applied strategy reduced nitrogen leaching and maintained grain yield of paddy fields in Northwest China

CONTROLLED-RELEASE UREA FOR RICE PRODUCTION AND ITS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS