Abstract:As the backbone of modern power systems, the smart grid is one of the most critical applications of the Internet of Things. The intelligent electricity system faces various types of unauthorized malicious access, that is, cyber‐attacks. With the development and application of information and communication technologies in traditional power systems, the improvement of physical‐cyber systems in the smart grid also increases. Nowadays, the deployment of defensive measures has surged in response to the growing number of attacks aimed at the smart grid. Therefore, in this paper, we investigate cyber‐attack identification using artificial intelligence‐based models and identify them by estimating the state vector of the electricity network. We accomplish simulations by extracting data from the five‐bus IEEE network to test the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. False data attack vectors are then injected into the healthy measurements. In this way, to check the detection power of the proposed algorithms, 2,000 measurement samples have been taken from the five‐bus network, half of which are considered healthy data and the other half as manipulated data. After labeling healthy and false data, machine‐learning algorithms such as decision trees and k‐nearest neighbor (KNN) have been used to investigate and identify this type of attack. Comparative analysis of the two proposed algorithms against commonly used methods demonstrates significantly improved accuracy. Specifically, according to the best depth for the decision‐tree algorithm and k for the KNN algorithm, it is drawn with k = 3 and the decision‐tree algorithm with a depth of 9. According to the algorithms proposed in this article, the decision‐tree algorithm with a depth of 9 in p‐value of 0.45 and 0.64 and the nearest neighbor algorithm with k = 3 in p is equal to 0.72, 0.98, and 1 represent better accuracy. Also, the results indicate that the two proposed algorithms have performed much more favorably than other classification methods. Additionally, the detection accuracy increases with higher p‐values for these two algorithms. This problem shows that the detectors can detect false data injection attacks that cause more severe disturbances in the system.

Cyber Attack Surface Analysis of Advanced Metering Infrastructure

Modeling and Defending Advanced Metering Infrastructure Subjected to Distributed Denial-of-Service Attacks

Review of Cyber-Physical Attacks and Counter Defense Mechanisms for Advanced Metering Infrastructure in Smart Grid

Towards a Framework for Cyber Attack Impact Analysis of Electric Cyber Physical Systems.

Impact Assessment and Defense for Smart Grids With FDIA Against AMI

Cybersecurity Deployment in Smart Grids: Critical Review, Applications, Protection, and Challenges

Smart Grid Cyber-Physical Situational Awareness of Complex Operational Technology Attacks: A Review

A Comprehensive Review on Cyber-Attacks in Power Systems: Impact Analysis, Detection, and Cyber Security

CCPA: Coordinated Cyber-Physical Attacks and Countermeasures in Smart Grid.

Cyber-Attacks on Smart Meters in Household Nanogrid: Modeling, Simulation and Analysis

Cyber security of a power grid: State-of-the-art

Cyber-security on smart grid: Threats and potential solutions

Cyber Security of Smart Grid Infrastructure

Threat analysis and adversarial model for Smart Grids

Cyberattack on the Microgrids Through Price Modification

Implementing AI Solutions for Advanced Cyber‐Attack Detection in Smart Grid

Cyber-attack TTP analysis for EPES systems

Impact Analysis of Cyber Attacks against Energy Communities in Distribution Grids

CVSS Based Attack Analysis Using a Graphical Security Model: Review and Smart Grid Case Study

Cybersecurity protection for power grid control infrastructures

Bad Data Injection in Smart Grid: Attack and Defense Mechanisms