0176 fMRI Neural Activation During Working Memory After 5-Nights of Sleep Restriction in Adolescents with ADHD Traits

Victoria Dionisos,Sinéad Moyles,Gina Mason,Taylor Christiansen,David Barker,Daniel Dickstein,Mary Carskadon,Jared Saletin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0176

IF: 6.313

2024-04-20

SLEEP

Abstract:Abstract Introduction Persistent sleep loss is common among adolescents. Its impact on cognitive functioning is well documented, particularly in working memory. We hypothesize that children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity-disorder (ADHD) may be particularly vulnerable to such effects. Here we examine the impact of 5-nights of at-home sleep restriction on the neural correlates of working memory in young adolescents with and without ADHD traits. Methods Twenty-five peripubertal adolescents (12.36±0.88 years, 14F) were characterized by Conners-3-Parent ADHD-Index [>=/< 50% tile] as either high (ADHDy; n=11) or low (ADHDn; n=14). All participants completed an fMRI-monitored working memory task after two counterbalanced conditions: 5-nights of sleep optimization (SO; 10h TIB set to habitual risetime) and 5-nights of sleep restriction (SR; 7.5h TIB, equally delaying bedtime and advancing risetime). At least two nights of stabilization preceded both conditions. fMRI sessions consisted of two 7-minute runs of alternating 2-back and 0-back working memory blocks. Voxel-wise 2x2 linear mixed effects models (3dLME) investigated condition [SR vs. SO], group [ADHDy vs. ADHDn], and interaction effects on working memory activation (2-back>0-back). Significance was set to p<.005, k=30 voxels. Results Our actigraphy monitored protocol significantly reduced sleep period time by 20% (SR= 7.39±0.43h vs. SO= 9.19±0.39h; [t(24)=17.66, p<.001; d=3.53]) and total sleep time by 17% (SR= 6.79±0.51h vs. SO= 8.20±0.60h; [t(24)=12.9, p<.001; d=2.58]). At SO, fMRI 2-back blocks were associated with increased activation in task-on areas, such as the bilateral dorsal lateral prefrontal, anterior cingulate, and superior parietal cortices, and decreased activation in default-mode task-off areas, including the precuneus and medial prefrontal cortex. Of these regions, significant condition-by-group effects indicated that sleep loss increased activation in the bilateral superior parietal cortex (MNIx,y,z: [40, -48, 68], k=172) and bilateral cuneus/precuneus (MNIx,y,z: [16, -84, 48], k=1446), only in the ADHDy group. Conclusion These data are the first to indicate that ADHD status may influence how sleep loss affects working memory in the adolescent brain. Sleep loss increased activation of both task-on (e.g., superior parietal) and task-off (e.g., precuneus) regions in the ADHDy group. We speculate this pattern may reflect less efficient neural processing after sleep loss. Ongoing data collection will probe sources of inter-individual variability. Support (if any) R01HD103655; P20GM139743

neurosciences,clinical neurology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the impact of sleep deprivation on neural activation in adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) traits during impulse control and working memory tasks.

The first part of the study simulates sleep deprivation by restricting sleep time and uses functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to observe participants' brain activity during an event-related Go/No-Go task. The study found that under normal sleep conditions, impulsive errors were associated with higher activation in the bilateral caudate nucleus, bilateral precentral gyrus, left inferior frontal gyrus, and bilateral insula. Under sleep restriction conditions, there were group differences in the activation pattern of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: for the group without significant ADHD traits (ADHDn), sleep restriction reduced the processing of error signals; however, for the group with ADHD traits (ADHDy), this reduction did not occur.

The second part of the study focused on the impact of 5 nights of sleep restriction on the working memory function of adolescents with or without ADHD traits. The results showed that sleep restriction significantly reduced total sleep time and sleep cycle time. Under normal optimized sleep conditions, the working memory task (2-back task) increased activation in task-related regions (such as bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and superior parietal lobule) and decreased activation in default mode network regions (such as precuneus and medial prefrontal cortex). In the group with ADHD traits, sleep loss led to increased activation in task-related regions (such as the superior parietal lobule) and default mode network regions (such as the precuneus), which may reflect reduced efficiency in processing working memory tasks under sleep-deprived conditions.

The third part of the study is about the work/rest schedules and fatigue management strategies of U.S. Navy Information Warfare Enterprise (IWE) shift workers. By evaluating two different shift systems (4-segment/12-hour shift system and 6-segment/8-hour shift system), it was found that most participants slept less than 7 hours per day and generally experienced poor sleep quality, excessive daytime sleepiness, and insomnia symptoms. Although shift workers tended to prefer the 6-segment/8-hour shift system, no significant differences were observed in daytime alertness, insomnia symptoms, mood states, or daytime sleep duration. Therefore, from a preference perspective, shorter work hours and more shift segments may be a better choice.