Abstract:Research Summary Startups that partner concurrently with a large corporation must compete for the latter's attention. We extend the attention‐based view from an intraorganizational to an interorganizational context, exploring how startups differ in the amount of attention they receive, their actions to attract and sustain attention, and the impact of attention dynamics on the relational outcome of the partnership. Our research uncovers two separate contests for attention involving corporate and divisional managers, highlighting the distributed nature of attention. Reflecting these, our findings reveal how startups' responsiveness to the respective cognitive schemas and corresponding stimuli of corporate and divisional managers is critical to understanding their distinct relational trajectories and disparate outcomes. Our focus on attention is complementary to the focus on trust that has hitherto dominated research on relational dynamics. Managerial Summary Startups partner with large corporations to access needed complementary resources. However, truly benefiting from such partnerships is challenging and requires them to attract as well as sustain the latter's attention. Our study reveals two contests for attention: one with corporate managers tasked with running a startup partnering initiative and the other with divisional managers in business units with whom actual commercial joint activity is forged. These two sets of managers have different priorities (schemas) that result in differences in the nature and amount of attention they pay to startups' actions (stimuli). Startups seeking corporate partnerships would do well to recognize this heterogeneity within large corporations and accordingly manage the attention–attraction process through suitable partner‐centric behaviors. On their part, large corporations need to be aware of and sensitive to the challenges such disparate schema of corporate and divisional managers pose for successful partnering outcomes as the relationship transitions from the early to later stages.

Partners and Rivals [MicroBusiness]

Physics-to-Technology Partnerships in the Semiconductor Industry

The limits to ‘spin-off’: UK defence R & D and the development of gallium arsenide technology

Product Architecture And Global Competitive Advantages: A Case Study Of Lg Electronics

Spinning off a Semiconductor company from University premises — The story of Camsemi

Microcapitalism and the mega-corporation

Building Castles from Sand: Unlocking CEO Mythopoetical Behaviour in Hewlett Packard from 1978 to 2005

The process of subsidiary strategy: a study of Ciba‐Geigy Classical Pigments

Internal Networking and Organisational Capability: Towards a New Perspective of the Firm

Information partnerships--shared data, shared scale

Research, Patents, and the Struggle to Control Radio: A Study of Big Business and the Uses of Industrial Research

Conflicting Subcultures in Mergers and Acquisitions: a Longitudinal Study of Integrating a Radical Internet Firm into a Bureaucratic Telecoms Firm

Macroelectronics: Perspectives on Technology and Applications

Corporate‐startup partnering: Exploring attention dynamics and relational outcomes in asymmetric settings

How to Destroy a Research & Development Group without Really Trying

Cooperation and Competition as Partners

Between promise and performance: Science and technology policy implementation through network governance

Semiconductor Manufacturing Business Revisited: Good Old Days at AT&T Bell Labs Microelectronics Plant in Orlando, Florida

University, Ltd: Changing a business school

Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from research and development organizations#

Political and Economic Teamwork: The Development of the Microelectronics Industry of Japan