Tuning the Selectivity between C 2 H 2 and CO 2 in Molecular Porous Materials

Katherine A. Forrest,Tony Pham,Kai-Jie Chen,Xue Jiang,David G. Madden,Douglas M. Franz,Adam Hogan,Michael J. Zaworotko,Brian Space
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02009
IF: 3.9
2021-11-17
Langmuir
Abstract:A combined experimental and theoretical study of C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption and separation was performed in two isostructural molecular porous materials (MPMs): <b>MPM-1-Cl</b> ([Cu<sub>2</sub>(adenine)<sub>4</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>]Cl<sub>2</sub>) and <b>MPM-1-TIFSIX</b> ([Cu<sub>2</sub>(adenine)<sub>4</sub>(TiF<sub>6</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]). It was revealed that <b>MPM-1-Cl</b> displayed higher low-pressure uptake, isosteric heat of adsorption (<i>Q</i><sub>st</sub>), and selectivity for C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub> than CO<sub>2</sub>, whereas the opposite was observed for <b>MPM-1-TIFSIX</b>. While <b>MPM-1-Cl</b> contains only one type of accessible channel, which has a greater preference toward C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>, <b>MPM-1-TIFSIX</b> contains three distinct accessible channels, one of which is a confined region between two large channels that represents the primary binding site for both adsorbates. According to molecular simulations, the initial adsorption site in <b>MPM-1-TIFSIX</b> interacts more strongly with CO<sub>2</sub> than C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>, thus explaining the inversion of adsorbate selectivity relative to <b>MPM-1-Cl</b>.
chemistry, multidisciplinary, physical,materials science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?