The Effect Mitigating Creditors-Shareholder Conflicts over Dividend Policy Accounting Conservatism: Evidence from Iran

M. Shoorvarzy,Masoomeh Tuzandehjani,M. Garkaz

Abstract:This study tries to investigate the relation of conflict of interest between creditors and shareholders regarding dividend-payout policy to conservation (precaution). The hypothesis developed in this study is: companies faced with more severe conflict of interests between creditors and shareholder regarding dividend- payouts policy, have more conservation accounting. The statistical with 120 firms were selected as statistical sample by sampling method of systematic deletion. The period under study is a nine-year period (1999-2007). And the statistical method of study is cross sectional regression. The results showed that there was a significant relation between conflict of interest between creditors and shareholders regarding dividend-payout policy and conservative accounting. accounting conservatism helps avoid in appropriate than real. Exercise caution not lead to hidden reserves or distributions to claim holders. Consistent with watts (1), unnecessary reserves or on purpose shows the income we argue that conservatism mitigates conflicts of interest and assets less than real and costs debts more than real. over dividend policy between shareholders and creditors. Our measure of conservatism is based on givoly and Specifically, we hypothesize that (1) firms experiencing hayn (2), who argue that conservative accounting leads more severe creditors and shareholders dividend policy to persistently negative accruals. In the long run, conflicts adopt more conservative accounting and (2) unbiased accounting results in the cumulative amount of firms that use more conservative accounting in cure a net income before depreciation and amortization lower debt cost. converging to operating cash flows. Thus, as both Conservative accounting reduces the earnings and positive and negative accruals reverse over time, net retained earnings amounts used in debt contracts to cumulative accruals should approach zero. In contrast, constrain dividends. Thus, choosing more conservative conservative accounting results in a persistent pattern of accounting is one may firm can reduce the risk to creditors negative accruals over time. This suggests that a firm's that it will pay excessive dividends to shareholders. mean accrual. Over a reasonably long period provides an This risk reduction is likely to be more important when accounting based, firm-specific proxy for conservatism. creditors-shareholders conflicts over dividend policy and Because we cannot directly observe the extent to which more severe. Moreover, we expect that if mangers choose managers voluntarily make conservative accounting more, conservative accounting then creditors will accept choices. Our two proxies for conservatism may reflect a lower rate of return in light of the reduced risk of GAAP Mandated conservatism as well as manager's dividend over payment.

Economics,Business