Abstract:Background: If worn during a fall, hip protectors substantially reduce risk for hip fracture. However, a major barrier to their clinical efficacy is poor user adherence. In long-term care, adherence likely depends on how committed care providers are to hip protectors, but empirical evidence is lacking due to the absence of a psychometrically valid assessment tool. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in a convenience sample of 529 paid care providers. We developed the 15-item C-HiP Index to measure commitment, comprised of three subscales: affective, cognitive and behavioural. Responses were subjected to hierarchical factor analysis and internal consistency testing. Eleven experts rated the relevance and clarity of items on 4-point Likert scales. We performed simple linear regression to determine whether C-HiP Index scores were positively related to the question, "Do you think of yourself as a champion of hip protectors", rated on a 5-point Likert scale. We examined whether the C-HiP Index could differentiate respondents: (i) who were aware of a protected fall causing hip fracture from those who were unaware; (ii) who agreed in the existence of a champion of hip protectors within their home from those who didn't. Results: Hierarchical factor analysis yielded two lower-order factors and a single higher-order factor, representing the overarching concept of commitment to hip protectors. Items from affective and cognitive subscales loaded highest on the first lower-order factor, while items from the behavioural subscale loaded highest on the second. We eliminated one item due to low factor matrix coefficients, and poor expert evaluation. The C-HiP Index had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.96. A one-unit increase in championing was associated with a 5.2-point (p < 0.01) increase in C-HiP Index score. Median C-HiP Index scores were 4.3-points lower (p < 0.01) among respondents aware of a protected fall causing hip fracture, and 7.0-points higher (p < 0.01) among respondents who agreed in the existence of a champion of hip protectors within their home. Conclusions: We offer evidence of the psychometric properties of the C-HiP Index. The development of a valid and reliable assessment tool is crucial to understanding the factors that govern adherence to hip protectors in long-term care.

Measuring willingness-to-pay for risk reduction: an application of conjoint analysis

Pricing environmental health risks: survey assessments of risk-risk and risk-dollar trade-offs for chronic bronchitis

Value of Information Analysis for a New Technology: Computer-Assisted Total Knee Replacement.

Valuing Insurance Against Small probability risks: A Meta-Analysis

[Study on willingness to participate and willingness to pay for hypothetical industrial injury insurance scheme].

Personalized information and willingness to pay for non-financial risk prevention: An experiment

A behavioral decomposition of willingness to pay for health insurance

On consumer preferences and the willingness to pay for term life insurance

Determinants of Willingness to Pay for Health Insurance in Germany—Results of the Population-Based Health Study of the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE-Adult-Study)

Measuring Consumer Risk-Return Tradeoffs

Differential Willingness of Household Heads to Pay Community-Based Health Insurance Premia for Themselves and Other Household Members.

Assigning value to preparation for prostate cancer decision making: a willingness to pay analysis

Validation and psychometric properties of the commitment to hip protectors (C-HiP) index in long-term care providers of British Columbia, Canada: a cross-sectional survey

Does ‘early purchase’ improve the willingness to pay for long-term care insurance?

Cost-effectiveness of a home safety intervention to prevent falls in impaired elderly people living in the community

Willingness to pay for alternative policies for patients with Alzheimer’s Disease

Willingness to pay: a valid and reliable measure of health state preference?

Willingness to pay for cancer prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment: a systematic review

High-risk pooling for mitigating risk selection incentives in health insurance markets with sophisticated risk equalization: an application based on health survey information

Risk preferences over health: empirical estimates and implications for medical decision-making