Are differences in the available aromatase inhibitors and inactivators significant?

P E Johnson,A Buzdar

Abstract:Aromatase inhibitors are endocrine agents with a different mode of action than tamoxifen against breast tumors. In postmenopausal women, estrogen concentrations are maintained primarily via aromatase, a cytochrome P-450 enzyme that acts at the final step in the estrogen synthesis pathway. The first clinically available aromatase inhibitor, aminoglutethimide, was introduced for the second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer in the late 1970s. Despite proven efficacy in this setting, its widespread use was limited by its overall toxicity and its lack of selectivity for the aromatase enzyme. This led to the search for novel, more effective, and less toxic aromatase inhibitors. As a result, several aromatase inhibitors with a high degree of selectivity for aromatase and improved tolerability have become clinically available for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: (a) anastrozole; (b) letrozole; (c) fadrozole; (d) formestane; and (e) exemestane. Of these, formestane and exemestane are steroidal nonreversible aromatase inhibitors, also known as aromatase inactivators, whereas fadrozole, anastrozole, and letrozole are nonsteroidal reversible aromatase inhibitors. These agents differ in pharmacokinetics, selectivity, and potency, although all are more selective than aminoglutethimide. Some differences in adverse effect profile are also noticeable between and within these two classes of agents. The clinical significance of these differences is not yet evident but may well prove to be relevant in the long-term adjunctive setting.