Abstract:Background: Periodontists have found the gingival autograft to be an effective and predictable technique to increase the amount of attached gingiva around teeth, but this technique requires the surgeon to harvest donor tissue from a remote surgical site. The present study seeks to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a tissue-engineered skin equivalent, a living human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute (HF-DDS), compared to a gingival autograft (GA) consisting of donor tissue harvested from the patient's palate in a procedure designed to increase the amount of keratinized tissue around teeth that do not require root coverage. Methods: Twenty-five patients with insufficient attached gingiva associated with at least two teeth in contralateral quadrants of the same jaw were treated. One tooth in each patient was randomized to receive either a GA (control) or a HF-DDS graft (test). Clinical parameters measured at baseline and 3, 5, 7, 9, and 12 months included recession, clinical attachment level, keratinized tissue height, and plaque index. Probing depth was measured at 7, 9, and 12 months. Inflammation of each site was scored and texture and color of the grafted tissue were compared to the surrounding tissue. Resistance to muscle pull was evaluated and a questionnaire was used to determine patient preference. Surgical position of the graft and alveolar bone level were recorded at the surgical visit and patients were evaluated weekly for the first 4 weeks at which time recession and level of oral hygiene were measured. Biopsies and persistence studies were performed on a subset of the patients. Results: Results for both test and control groups were similar for all measured clinical parameters with the exception of amount of keratinized tissue and percent shrinkage of keratinized tissue. The control group exhibited an average of 1.0 to 1.2 mm more keratinized tissue over time than the test group (P <0.001) and the control group had about half as much shrinkage as the test group over time (P <0.001). Test sites demonstrated significantly better color match over time compared to control sites. Similarly, tissue texture for test sites was significantly better than control sites over time. Conclusions: Based on the results of this investigation, the tissue engineered HF-DDS graft was safe and capable of generating keratinized tissue without the morbidity and potential clinical difficulties associated with donor site surgery. The GA generated more keratinized tissue and shrank less than the HF-DDS graft, but the test graft generated tissue that appeared more natural.

Evaluation of frozen subepithelial connective tissue grafts to increase the zone of attached gingiva. Report of 5 cases

Connective tissue versus free gingival grafts for deep mandibular anterior recessions. A 2- to 5-year cross-sectional study

Use of subepithelial connective tissue graft as a biological barrier: a human clinical and histologic case report

Subepithelial connective tissue grafts in the treatment of gingival recessions. A comparative study of 2 procedures

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of periodontal applications of a living tissue-engineered human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute. I. Comparison to the gingival autograft: a randomized controlled pilot study

Clinical and histologic evaluation of different approaches to gain keratinized tissue prior to implant placement in fully edentulous patients

Clinical Evaluations of Free Gingival Grafting Before Implant Placement to Increase Keratinized Tissue Width in Molar Regions: A Retrospective Case Series.

Comparison of Root Coverage by the Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft With and Without Root Biomodification: A Comprehensive Clinical Study

Randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a xenogeneic collagen matrix as an alternative to free gingival grafting for oral soft tissue augmentation

Clinical Study of Free Palatal Connective Tissue Grafts for Enhancement of Periimplant Soft Tissue Topography in Maxillary Esthetic Area

The Effect of Connective Tissue Graft Compared to Concentrated Growth Factor Graft on Buccal Peri-Implant Gingival Thickness: A 12-month Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Prevention of gingival recession following flap debridement surgery by subepithelial connective tissue graft: consecutive case series

Acellular dermal matrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part 1. A clinical study

Clinical Observations of Soft Tissue Dimensions Around Teeth and Implants After Free Gingival Graft

The partly epithelialized free gingival graft (pe-fgg) at lower incisors. A pilot study with implications for alignment of the mucogingival junction.

Peri-implant keratinized gingiva augmentation using xenogeneic collagen matrix and platelet-rich fibrin: A case report

Comparative histological evaluation of intra- and extraorally de-epithelialized connective tissue graft samples harvested from the posterior palate region

Width of keratinized tissue after gingivoplasty of healed subepithelial connective tissue grafts

Glycosaminoglycans in Gingival Crevicular Fluid of Patients with Periodontal Class Ii Furcation Involvement Before and after Guided Tissue Regeneration. A Pilot Study

A modified geometric technique to increase peri‐implant keratinized mucosa

Keratinized tissue gain after free gingival graft augmentation procedures around teeth and dental implants: A prospective observational study