[Thrombophilia--diagnostic steps and therapeutic consequences after deep vein thrombosis]

A Loew,H Völler,H Riess
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-19976
2002-02-08
Abstract:In developed countries there is an age dependent increasing incidence of deep vein thrombosis. Hereditary thrombophilia is usually suspected by the clinical constellation and anamnestic informations. For economical reasons usually laboratory testing should be avoided if the results will not change directly the therapeutic process. But for hereditary defects consequences for the patient in future and for relatives should be taken into account especially as more selective strategies for prophylaxis and treatment have to be expected by increasing information in that field of research. As deficiencies of anticoagulant proteins (PC, PS, AT) have an impact on anticoagulant treatment, the indication for testing should not be held too strict. Time point for diagnostic procedures should be early after a thromboembolic event as negative results exclude hereditary defects definitely which allows the planning of the aimed treatment duration. After first onset of deep vein thrombosis, even in presence of hereditary coagulation defects the duration of anticoagulation usually depends on the clinical and anamnestic signs for a thrombophilic tendency of the individual patient. First publications suggest the need for prolonged anticoagulation of carriers with combined defects, showing an elevated rate of re-thrombosis after the first thromboembolic event, when anticoagulation is stopped. Every ongoing anticoagulation should be checked repeatedly in the sense of a risk -benefit evaluation even for patients with a thrombophilic tendency and should be adapted to actual publications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?