Glycemic control target for liver and cardiovascular events risk in metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease

Nobuharu Tamaki,Shun‐Ichi Wakabayashi,Takefumi Kimura,Yutaka Yasui,Kaoru Tsuchiya,Hiroyuki Nakanishi,Daniel Q. Huang,Takeji Umemura,Masayuki Kurosaki,Namiki Izumi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.14025
2024-02-25
Hepatology Research
Abstract:The risk of liver‐related events as well as major adverse cardiovascular events increased in a dose‐dependent fashion with an increase in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, except for patients with HbA1c <5.0% for liver‐related events. An HbA1c level of 7% was the optimal threshold associated with a lower risk of complications and may be utilized as a target for glycemic control in patients with MASLD. Aims Optimizing glycemic control may prevent liver‐related events and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). However, the optimal hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) threshold associated with a lower risk of complications, particularly liver‐related events as well as MACE is unknown. Methods We investigated a nationwide population‐based cohort and identified 633 279 patients with MASLD, with a mean follow‐up of 4.2 years. Hemoglobin A1c levels were measured annually. The primary endpoint was the risk of liver‐related events and MACE and to determine the optimal HbA1c level associated with the risk of complications. Results Mean HbA1c (per 1%) was associated with liver‐related events (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–1.42) as well as MACE (sHR 1.36; 95% CI, 1.32–1.41) after adjustment for confounders. Multivariable sHR (95% CI) for HbA1c of <5.0%, 6.0%–6.9%, 7.0%–7.9%, 8.0%–8.9%, and ≥9.0% (reference, 5.0%–5.9%) were 14 (9.1–22), 1.70 (1.2–2.3), 3.32 (2.3–4.8), 3.81 (2.1–6.8), and 4.83 (2.4–9.6) for liver‐related events, and 1.24 (0.8–1.8), 1.27 (1.2–1.4), 1.70 (1.5–2.0), 2.36 (1.9–2.9), and 4.17 (3.5–5.0) for MACE. An HbA1c level of 7% was selected as the optimal threshold for predicting complications (sHR 2.40 [1.8–3.2] for liver‐related events and 1.98 [1.8–2.2] for MACE). Conclusion The risk of liver‐related events as well as MACE increased in a dose‐dependent fashion with an increase in HbA1c levels, except for patients with HbA1c <5.0% for liver‐related events. An HbA1c level of 7% was the optimal threshold associated with a lower risk of complications and may be utilized as a target for glycemic control in patients with MASLD.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?