Transforming growth factor-beta1 supports the rapid morphogenesis of heterotopic endochondral bone initiated by human osteogenic protein-1 via the synergistic upregulation of molecular markers

T Matsaba,L N Ramoshebi,J Crooks,U Ripamonti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/08977190109001077
Growth Factors
Abstract:Members of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily of proteins, the bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) and the TGF-beta isoforms, are involved in the coordination of cartilage and bone differentiation both in embryonic development and in postnatal life. Both osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1) and TGF-beta1 have been shown to be potent regulators and inducers of heterotopic endochondral bone induction in non-human primates. In marked contrast, TGF-beta1 does not induce heterotopic endochondral bone in rodents. In the primate, the osteogenic properties of OP-1 are synergistically enhanced by the combined administration of TGF-beta1. The binary application of OP-1 (0.1, 0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 microg) and TGF-beta1 (0.01, 0.03 and 0.1 microg) to 25 mg of guanidinium-inactivated insoluble collagenous bone matrix as carrier in the rodent heterotopic bioassay for 7, 12 and 21 days resulted in a classical synergistic, dose-dependent and temporal up-regulation of OP-1-induced endochondral bone formation. There were significant increases in alkaline phosphatase activity (day 12) and calcium content (days 12 and 21). mRNA expression of OP-1, TGF-beta1, BMP-3 and collagens type II and IV, markers of bone formation, showed an up-regulation of the genes (days 12 and 21) by the binary applications of the morphogens. Histologically, single applications of OP-1 elicited a dose dependent induction of endochondral bone formation while the binary applications resulted in a temporal acceleration of the morphogenetic cascade. The optimal ratio of OP-1/TGF-beta1 was 30:1 by weight for endochondral bone formation and expression of molecular markers. The present data provides insights to the mechanisms of synergistic molecular therapeutics for endochondral bone formation in clinical contexts.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?