Ru/CeO2 catalyst with optimized CeO2 morphology and surface facet for efficient hydrogenation of ethyl levulinate to γ-valerolactone

Xiaoqing Gao,Shanhui Zhu,Mei Dong,Jianguo Wang,Weibin Fan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2020.05.012
IF: 7.3
2020-09-01
Journal of Catalysis
Abstract:<p>Three Ru/CeO<sub>2</sub> catalysts with different CeO<sub>2</sub> morphology (nanorod, nanocube and nano-octahedra) mainly exposed (110) + (100), (100) and (111) facets for hydrogenation of biomass-derived ethyl levulinate (EL) to valuable γ-valerolactone (GVL). Ru/CeO<sub>2</sub>-rod with exposed (110) crystal plane obtained the highest GVL yield (99.4%) and best productivity (13140 h<sup>−1</sup>). The surface facets of CeO<sub>2</sub> supports not only affect the chemical states of Ru species but also tune the concentration of oxygen vacancy in Ru-CeO<sub>2</sub> interface. The concentration of oxygen vacancy shows a linear relationship with GVL production rate. DFT calculations indicates that the lactonization of CH<sub>3</sub>CHOCH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>CO* to produce GVL is the rate-determining step in EL hydrogenation, and Ru<sub>10</sub>/CeO<sub>2</sub> (110) with more oxygen vacancy has low activation energy barrier, compared to Ru<sub>10</sub>/CeO<sub>2</sub> (100) and Ru<sub>10</sub>/CeO<sub>2</sub> (111).</p>
chemistry, physical,engineering, chemical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?