Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

Nonlinear price transmission and asynchronous price bubbles: empirical evidence from China's agricultural futures and spot markets

A Study of Risk Spillover Between Futures and Spot Markets——An Empirical Analysis on China's Soybean Market

Price Discovery in the Spot -Futures Markets:An Empirical Analysis in Chinese Agricultural Products

Information Transmission Effect Between Agricultural Commodity Futures Market and Spot Market in China

Information transmission in informationally linked markets: Evidence from US and Chinese commodity futures markets

An empirical study on information spillover effects between the Chinese copper futures market and spot market

Research on the dynamic relationship between China's soybean oil futures and spot price:Empirical analysis based on daily data

The role of price spillovers: what is different in China

Asymmetric Price Volatility Transmission in Agricultural Supply Chains: Evidence from the Chinese Pork Market

Detecting speculative bubbles in the Chinese energy market: evidence from a GSADF test

Institutional high frequency trading and price discovery: Evidence from an emerging commodity futures market

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

Booms and Busts in the Oil Market: Identifying Speculative Bubbles Using a Continuous-Time Dynamic System

The dynamic impact of international agricultural commodity price fluctuation on Chinese agricultural commodity prices

Liquidity of China’s agricultural futures market: measurement and cross-market dependence

Did bubbles migrate from the stock to the housing market in China between 2005 and 2010?

The Multi-Market Analysis of A Housing Price Transmission Model

Research on multiple bubbles in China's multi-level stock market

Uncovering the Sino-US dynamic risk spillovers effects: Evidence from agricultural futures markets

Policy-driven or market-driven? Evidence from steam coal price bubbles in China

Uncovering the Sino‐US Dynamic Risk Spillovers Effects: Evidence From Agricultural Futures Markets