Suicide Risk Screening for Head and Neck Cancer Patients: An Implementation Study
Bhargav Kansara,Ameer Basta,Marian Mikhael,Randa Perkins,Phillip Reisman,Julie Hallanger-Johnson,Dana E. Rollison,Oliver T. Nguyen,Sean Powell,Scott M. Gilbert,Kea Turner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787006
IF: 2.762
2024-05-23
Applied Clinical Informatics
Abstract:Objectives There is limited research on suicide risk screening (SRS) among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, a population at increased risk for suicide. To address this gap, this single-site mixed methods study assessed oncology professionals' perspectives about the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of an electronic SRS program that was implemented as a part of routine care for HNC patients. Methods Staff who assisted with SRS implementation completed (e.g., nurses, medical assistants, advanced practice providers, physicians, social workers) a one-time survey ( N = 29) and interview ( N = 25). Quantitative outcomes were assessed using previously validated feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness measures. Additional qualitative data were collected to provide context for interpreting the scores. Results Nurses and medical assistants, who were directly responsible for implementing SRS, reported low feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness, compared with other team members (e.g., physicians, social workers, advanced practice providers). Team members identified potential improvements needed to optimize SRS, such as hiring additional staff, improving staff training, providing different modalities for screening completion among individuals with disabilities, and revising the patient-reported outcomes to improve suicide risk prediction. Conclusion Staff perspectives about implementing SRS as a part of routine cancer care for HNC patients varied widely. Before screening can be implemented on a larger scale for HNC and other cancer patients, additional implementation strategies may be needed that optimize workflow and reduce staff burden, such as staff training, multiple modalities for completion, and refined tools for identifying which patients are at greatest risk for suicide. To protect the privacy of the individuals that participated in this study, the individual-level data underlying this article cannot be shared. Summary-level data may be requested. B.K.: Conceptualization; Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing; Methodology; A.B.: Writing—review & editing; M.M.: Writing—review & editing; R.P.: Writing—review & editing; P.R.: Writing—review & editing; J.H.J.: Writing—review & editing; D.E.R.: Writing—review & editing; O.T.N.: Writing—review & editing; S.P.: Writing—review & editing; S.M.G.: Writing—review & editing; K.T.: Conceptualization; Methodology; Project administration. Moffitt Cancer Center Institutional Review Board of Record, Advarra, reviewed the study protocol and determined the study to be exempt. Received: 12 January 2024 Accepted: 27 March 2024 Article published online: 22 May 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
medical informatics